Welcome to Southern Nationalist Network

Member Login

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Sign Up!

‘Secede’ billboard goes up in Montgomery

May 16, 2014
By

The League of the South has unveiled its second ‘secede’ billboard, this time in Montgomery, Alabama. The first ‘secede’ billboard went up in Tallahassee, Florida, provoked a response from the Florida Chamber of Commerce (which put up its own ‘succeed’ billboard nearby), made television news and was covered by many media outlets. The latest League billboard comes on the heels of a successful demonstration in Montgomery against the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far-Left and anti-White organisation which is currently suing the State in Federal court because of its popular law defining marriage in traditional terms. That demonstration was covered by newspapers from San Francisco to Boston and by local television and radio stations as well. On June 27-28 the League will hold its national conference in nearby Wetumpka, Alabama.

Note: The picture below is courtesy of Occidental Dissent.

Also see: League of the South’s protest against SPLC a major news story, ‘Secede’ billboard raised in Tallahassee and Florida Chamber of Commerce copies League’s ‘secede’ billboard

Secede billboard in Montgomery

Tags: , , ,

  • Logan Smith

    Can’t wait to hear the news about this one. We need one of these in every Southern State.

  • http://saberpoint.blogspot.com/ Stogie Chomper

    I need to rejoin the League. The USA is sliding quickly into fascism and the need for secession becomes more obvious with each passing day. America as we knew it is gone.

    • Long Live Dixie

      Fascism is radically nationalistic. Few societies are less fascist than the US is.

  • doncon

    This is the “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”, not the divided States of America. Enough of this seditious crap, this represents nothing but treason and all who support this need to be treated as to what they are…TRAITORS. You are all a shame to every American who has given their life fighting for this country. SHAME on you.

    • Tom Sanders

      whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is
      the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
      Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its
      powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their
      Safety and Happiness.

      • doncon

        I love this country, don’t always agree with everything,but still will defend it with all I am capable of and that includes defending it against those like you. Lunatics.

        • cleburne61

          You’re confusing a government with a country. The States were here long before they created DC, and they’ll be here long after DC is a ruin.

          • Virginian Secessionist

            That’s right. Virginia has been around since 1607. What is DC that it should dictate to her?

    • Virginian Secessionist

      Would you call the Founding Fathers traitors to the American people? What about Patrick Henry, who said of the Constitution, ‘I smell a rat’? What of Light Horse Harry Lee, who said, ‘Virginia is my country’? These men, though they were *Founding Fathers* did not agree with you…

      • doncon

        You and the others idiots who posted this are not the founding fathers….I would compare you closer to the Nazis than to any founding father. You are a “TRAITOR”,plain and simple.

        • cleburne61

          Again, more name calling. That’s all this man knows. Cogent arguments and dialogue are the furthest things from his mind.

          If loving our people, and hating tyranny enough to create a new country in our own lands, is enough to make us ” traitors”, then great. In that case, it’s a badge of honor…

        • Logan Smith

          You’re more like NAZIs than we are. We’re not forcing people to stay within the borders of another people who despise them, and force their own laws and beliefs down their throats.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Let’s not lower ourselves to the level of the Left by throwing around the “Nazi” slur. The truth is that most of Europe’s few remaining National-Socialists would prefer us to the race-denying, pro-US zombies like our foe here. And I see no reason for shame in that.

          • Marcusjohn

            Yes all you white southerns need to leave and give the land back to the Indians.

            • Long Live Dixie

              It’s funny how the Left never calls for all the Turks, Pakistanis, Africans, Arabs, Moors, etc., to leave Europe.

            • Marcusjohn

              Wait I don’t understand, Indians are tied to the land more then you will ever be. In fact your ancestors were the invaders and displaced the Indians and participated in enslaving the blacks. Your hands are clean and are dirtier then most.

            • Tom Sanders

              “New archaeological evidence suggests that
              America was first discovered by Stone Age people from Europe – 10,000
              years before the Siberian-originating ancestors of the American Indians
              set foot in the New World.”

              http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/new-evidence-suggests-stone-age-hunters-from-europe-discovered-america-7447152.html

              Excuse me?

              Who did you say was here first?

            • Virginian Secessionist

              I’ve always had trouble with this theory. But even if it is true, it is meaningless for us, since these are not our ancestors. They would be a completely disconnected group of whites. The Pretani settled in modern day England over a thousand years before the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes arrived. That history does not make Anglosaxons ‘here first’ in England. The fact that the Anglosaxons built the English civilisation in Britannia is what gives them a right to exist there. Likewise, the fact that we Southrons built a civilisation here is what gives us a right to exist here.

              Tl;dr – I don’t care whether or not some stone age white guys were here before the Amerindians. I am a descendant of John Ellison, who arrived in Jamestowne before the settlement was more than 15 years old. That’s all the claim I need.

            • Tom Sanders

              I’m not quite sure I understand why you have trouble with archaeological evidence, but it’s salient because it points out the hypocrisy of the other side.

              They claim whites have no right to the land because the Indians were here first, so therefore, the Indians, in turn, have no right to the land because they displaced another group that was here before them.

              The fact of the matter is, no groups name is stamped on any piece of property(Despite what some preacher may say on Sunday about a certain middle eastern country), if you not capable or willing to defend you land/people/culture you’ll lose it.

            • Logan Smith

              Agreed, people are conquered, borders are redrawn, and new countries are born. Although, that does not relinquish the right of a people to fight back against invaders; but if they lose, then they lose.

            • Marcusjohn

              Like the south lost.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              The Irish and Greeks also lost the first time they tried…

            • Marcusjohn

              I’m not historian so I cannot challenge the facts as you perceive them. However as I believe if the Antebellum Southerns could have built there civilization with their own hands instead of off the backs of African slaves then there would not have been a need to destroy them. Even after the civil war it would take African Americans another 100 years and a civil rights movement to achieve the same right whites take for granted. I oppose your views but I respect your right to have them.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              First of all, much of the Antebellum South was built by Southrons. Second, much of your beloved North was also built by slaves (including the White House, built by slave labour even as Lincoln fought to supposedly free our Southern slaves…).

              The first lesson in higher education, Marcus, is do not simply trust what the ‘authorities’ tell you on a subject, but study it independently to either verify or falsify their claims.

            • Marcusjohn

              Yes I agree with you the Antebellum South was built by enslaved Southrons, and the North used slaves also but two wrongs don’t make a right. And America made a ballon payment for slavery by fighting the Civil War.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              Now you’re talking through both sides of your mouth…

            • Virginian Secessionist

              I have problems with anything supposedly older than 8,000 years. Besides, archaeology alone can’t prove much. It can only confirm or (more rarely) contradict written records. Without written records, there’s not much it can accurately do besides say, ‘Someone was here sometime in the past’.

              I’m all for defending our land, people, and culture. I simply reject the notion that some white guys who are in no way related to us and supposedly got here long before the Amerindians are at all a help to our cause.

            • Tom Sanders

              I won’t even ask what’s so supposedly magical about the date 6000 BC, but what’s so special about the field of archaeology that
              human reason and logic suddenly fails us? We’ve certainly learned a lot
              about physics, chemistry, mathematics etc. without having someone hand us a primordial text on the respective subjects.

              Of course those Europeans who came here thousands of years ago are related to you, you obviously share a common ancestor, your European family tree dates much further back than John Ellison.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              Talking down like that does not encourage discussion. I am not belittling the field of archaeology, merely admitting to its limitations, as any true scientist would do.

              The relation is so distant as to be meaningless. As I said, the presence of white Celts in England from ancient times did not magically make the Anglosaxon claim more valid. The Anglosaxon claim was one of conquest and colonisation, that *they* built a civilisation there, which was forged into the world’s most powerful empire after a millennium. The modern English don’t need a pre-Anglosaxon claim to England. And neither do we need a pre-Jamestowne claim to Dixie.

            • James Owen

              It’s enough to defend Jamestown against the Mayflower lie as it is.

            • Tom Sanders

              So, I take it your a credentialed archeologist who can speak authoritatively on limits of the science? You obviously have a different opinion then Professor Stanford of the Smithsonian institution, interesting.

              As I pointed out before, it’s important because the other side correctly sees this as a propaganda war. Do you think they care that the blacks in south Africa aren’t native to the land, but were brought there by the Dutch? No, they have an agenda, white guilt and it has been very very effective. So any piece of information that supports our cause is very meaningful.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              I studied under such a person, yes. I am well aware of the limitations of archaeology. I will repeat, I am not belittling it. I am doing what few scientists these days are willing to do and admitting to limitations.

              Propaganda is only important if it actually helps our cause. For example, spreading the truth that Jamestowne predates Plymouth. Spreading the truth that Southrons built a mighty civilisation here. These are things which must be preached loudly and often. The presence of unrelated whites predating the Amerindians is as meaningless to us as the presence of the Pretani is meaningless to the English.

            • Tom Sanders

              Propaganda is only effective if it’s succinct. Most people don’t know or care that Jamestown was founded before Plymouth and certainly aren’t going to take the time to sit down and read a 100 page treatise on the subject. Look at the propaganda of the other side, everything can be summed up in one sentence. The Civil War was fought over slavery. Whites stole land from the Indians. Diversity is good. For better or worse, we have to take a page from the book of politics, if your point can’t be made in 30 seconds it’s worthless.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              We aren’t White Nationalists. So your message is not beneficial. We’re Southron Nationalists.

            • Tom Sanders

              There’s no point being a Southern Nationalist unless your also a White Nationalists.

            • Tom Sanders

              There’s no point in being a Southern Nationalist unless your also a White Nationalist. If not, you might as well be ,excuse the pun, Whistling Dixie.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              Was it your intention to triple post?

            • Tom Sanders

              No, I didn’t triple post??

            • Virginian Secessionist

              Either you did, or one or two ‘guests’ simply tried to post roughly the same thing you did at the same time you did…

            • Tom Sanders

              Wow, this is serious, better call the Police forensics lab on this one.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              I was merely curious as to whether you were trolling (intentional triple post) or if it were an accident. Both are possible, and I did not wish to react to either possibility without knowing which was true. Either way, I am really growing to dislike your attitude…

            • Tom Sanders

              Well, I don’t want this to get any more acrimonious than it already is. You seem like an intelligent person sincere in his beliefs. So, I wish you the best.

            • Tom Sanders

              There’s no point in being a Southern Nationalist unless your also a
              White Nationalist. If not, you might as well be
              Whistling Dixie.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              False. Yankees are white, too. But they have no place in our country. There is no nation White. White is a race. The Southron Nation happens to be a part of the White Race, just like the Scottish Nation, the Swedish Nation, and the Greek Nation. But there is no White Nation, and White Nationalism is just as dangerous to our cause as Rainbowism.

            • Long Live Dixie

              Look to Europe. Europe is full of German nationalists, Greek nationalists, Russian nationalists, and so on. There are even examples in the New World: Afrikaner nationalists, Aussie nationalists, and so on. They are all white – and proudly so. But they don’t call themselves white nationalists. White nationalism is a peculiar American phenomenon. It is meant to appeal to people who don’t have a strong national identity and who don’t have deep roots in their land. We have those things, so what does white nationalism offer us? Think of white nationalism as racialism for cosmopolitan Euro-mutts. Let’s leave WNism to the Yankees. We Southerners are better than that.

            • Tom Sanders

              I know what an ethnic German looks like, I know what an ethnic Greek looks like, I even know what an ethnic Russian looks like, but what does an ethnic southerner look like? Many black people call themselves southerners and indeed their families have been here hundreds of years. Germans, Russian, Greeks etc. Don’t have to use the moniker “white nationalist”, because their ethnicity is their country.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              If you don’t know what an ethnic Southron looks like, you must not be using your eyes. There’s plenty of portraits of us from throughout our history. You can see modern examples of us in the videos and pictures posted on this site.

              There’s plenty of blacks, Arabs, and others who call themselves British. Doesn’t make it so.

            • Tom Sanders

              Yes, but how many blacks and Arabs call themselves white nationalist. :)

            • Virginian Secessionist

              And this question is relevant… why?

            • Long Live Dixie

              Wait a second – we can’t claim the exclusive use of the title “Southerner” just because we have minority nations living among us? You use the example of ethnic Russians, yet Russia (like Dixie) has had many minority nationalities for centuries. So, why the double standard?

            • Tom Sanders

              If you note, I use the term “ethnic” to distinguish between a persons ethnicity and a persons citizenship. There’s no double standard, you can use any term you wish to describe yourself, as Humpty Dumpty said to Alice, a word means just what I choose it to mean,neither more nor less.

            • Long Live Dixie

              How is there not a double standard? You’re using Dixie’s large black population as a justification to ignore that there is a Southern nationality but you’re not using Russia’s large Asiatic population as a justification to ignore that there is a Russian nationality. Instead, you admit that there is a Russian nationality. So, why can’t there also be a Southern nationality?

            • WhiteSouthron

              In a sense we are WNist, since the Southron people are White. I have
              moved away from the more popular WN motto of ORION (our race is our
              nation) however.

              It’s like saying the Japanese are yellow
              nationalists. It’s a natural truth, but I doubt they want to be flooded with
              Chinese immigration.

              Not sure how Tom means it though.

            • Long Live Dixie

              I think you might be confusing white nationalism and white racialism.

              I have no problem calling myself a white racialist. I am white and make no apologies for it. I feel at least some connection with most whites in the world and I hope they fare well in their struggles against the agents of white genocide.

              But I certainly am not a white nationalist. I do not believe that whites are a nation. I do not believe that Dixie would be better off as a melting pot of all whites. I do not look at a map to try to find some distant land in the Pacific Northwest to flee to. I do not cheer when I hear of Yankees moving to Dixie and “reinforcing” our white population (as the WNs call it).
              Logically speaking, I consider white nationalism and Southern nationalism to be mutually exclusive. Each requires a national identity that is in conflict with the other.

            • Tom Sanders

              I know of no WN who is for erasing national borders or for a conglomeration of all whites. On the contrary, I believe our interest are best served as individual distinct nations. However, I cannot agree with
              VS assertion that WN is just as dangerous as “Rainbowism”. Following that logic, one must believe that 1 million Scots moving to this country is no more preferable than 1 million huto tribesmen.

            • Long Live Dixie

              You should check Stormfront’s FAQs:

              Q. Would all Whites be welcome in your separate state?
              A. Absolutely. There would be no restriction by country of origin, and no genetic tests, skin color or hair color tests or any nonsense like that.

            • Tom Sanders

              You left out an important part of that quote” The only restriction would be that those who would wish to recreate the present
              system by importing non-Whites and then encouraging their hostility would not be welcome. They would have to remain in or move to the lands ceded to the non-Whites.”

              That’s not about erasing borders, it’s about salvaging something out of what’s left of the United States as it stands now, who knows what’s going to happen in the future. or what lands we’ll be able to salvage,(I can’t imagine southern Florida or parts of Texas ,for example, being in any new country that may form.)

            • Long Live Dixie

              The second part of the quote is not relevant. We are discussing whether white nationalists want to blend the white nations together. The first part of the quote (what I posted) addresses that issue and answers it in the affirmative. The second part of the quote (what you posted) is about a separate subject.

              I never said anything about erasing borders. I’m sure WNists envision a tight border around their proposed state. But they also envision their proposed state as being a white melting pot open to all WNists from the around the world. I don’t know how much clearer they need to say it for you. Just head over to Stormfront, register an account, and then start posting in support of Southern nationalism. It won’t take long till they start calling you “divisive”, a “troll”, an “anti-white”, and so on. There’s a good chance you’ll end up in Opposing Views – which is exactly where I ended up when I tried that a few years ago.

              The best we can hope for from WNists is that some of the Southern WNists will see the light and come to our side. I think a lot of self-proclaimed WNists don’t really understand the full implications of their professed ideology, so it wouldn’t take much effort to convince them to ditch it.

            • Tom Sanders

              The reality of the situation is that neither a southern nation or white nationalist state exist, but if either does manage to emerge I would support it. WN, don’t want have an ideology bent on “blending” all whites together in order to form some sort of “white” mongrel, to say such a thing is absurd, but if separatism necessitates bringing in other whites with similar ideology, then only a fool would be against it.

            • Long Live Dixie

              - A Southern nation exists already. The Southern nation is the Southern people. Nation = people, tribe, folk.

              – I’ve already shown you the quote from the SF FAQ which you seem to be conveniently ignoring. I’ve talked to enough white nationalists over the years to know that many of them think white mixing is ideal. Arguments such as “America’s mixing of whites is what made America strong” are commonplace in white nationalist circles.

              – I guess we’re all fools here then, since we think the South should be for Southerners. We’re not interested in creating a proposition nation here where the only requirement is to pass a political test. That’s a Yankee idea.

            • Tom Sanders

              Really? Then show me your Southern Nation passport. Where is the Capitol?Who is your President? What is the size of your army? With out these things Southerners are merely a cultural minority in the larger American empire. A southern people exist, but not a southern nation.

              So you really think WN want to erase the distinction between nationalities? In other words they don’t want Germany and France, for example, to exist as separate, individual nations?

            • Virginian Secessionist

              You really don’t understand what a ‘nation’ is, do you? You’re speaking of a sovereign country, not a nation. There may not at present exist a sovereign country of Dixie, but the Southern Nation still exists, and has for centuries.

            • Tom Sanders

              Nation-“a country, especially when thought of as a large group of people living in one area with their own government” – Cambridge dictionary… my use of the word is correct.

            • Long Live Dixie

              Nation – “A large aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory” – Oxford Dictionary

            • Tom Sanders

              That’s right, there is more than one definition,and my use of the word “nation” is still correct.

            • Long Live Dixie

              - I told you what I mean by “nation”. Review paragraph # 1 above.

              – Many white nationalists want to erase distinctions between white nations. Some want to apply white mixing only to North America. Others want to include Europe. The former talk of a North American Imperium, they downplay differences between Northerners and Southerners, they claim that white mixing is beneficial, and they consider Southern nationalism to be divisive. Instead of talking to me about what WNs believe, why don’t you just go tell some WNs that you think Dixie should be the home of the Southern people and that our uninvited newcomers from the North need to leave. Then come back here to tell us what their reaction was.

            • Tom Sanders

              I’ll say to you what I said to VS, I don’t want this to get any more acrimonious than it already is.
              You seem like an intelligent person sincere in his beliefs. So, I wish
              you the best.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              Scots are our ethnic kin. But yes, such a massive influx of them would be harmful. A million Scots would have a harder time assimilating into our population.

              Though a mass influx of whites with whom we have a more distant relation, such as Slavs, would be more harmful. And a mass influx of non-whites would be even more harmful than that.

              Our fellow whites can be assimilated in small groups, even Slavs, Greeks, Russians, Finns, and others who have never been historic ancestors of the Southron people. But en masse, even our close kin would be potentially hazardous.

            • Tom Sanders

              So, what would you do with my next door neighbor, he’s a South African orthopedics surgeon who fled his county 20 years ago because of Black rule? Should we throw him and his family out?

            • Virginian Secessionist

              Go back. Reread what I said. You clearly missed a very important part of my post.

            • Tom Sanders

              No, I missed nothing, so how many would you allow in? For that matter ,how long does one, or that persons family, have to have lived in the south to be considered a southerner? I really need to know the prerequisites just to make sure I make the cut.

            • Marcusjohn

              Stone Age people, really…Well they were probaly Africans since the first civilizations and peoples came from Africa.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              *Mesopotamia

            • Tom Sanders

              Well, they may have been from Africa, but one thing is for sure, they probaBly didn’t have a shortage of b’s. Why do I even bother.

        • Virginian Secessionist

          Failure to counter the point results in forfeiture of the argument. You have done nothing to convince anyone, merely thrown about names like a middle-schooler. What’s next? ‘Neener! Neener!’ ?

        • Kenny Shackleford

          The sign is gone. RACIST LOST.

          • cleburne61

            *laughs* Thanks for the comic relief, Kenny.

            Don’t worry!

            We’ll have another one up just down the road, before you can say “Morris Dees is my homie!”

            These bully tactics didn’t stop us last year in TN, they won’t stop us now.

          • Mark Saint

            Actually no. The removal of the sign has caused me to now get involved in guerilla advertising for our cause. It will be noticed on the routes which I drive in my business.

    • Long Live Dixie

      Some people base their loyalties on a scrap of paper and abstract ideas. We base our loyalties on blood, land, culture, and shared history. The former is statism. The latter is nationalism.

      Our views are incompatible with each other. There is nothing more to say to Yankee imperialists like you.

    • Anti-Federalist

      Well, what precisely is the “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”

      Is it a race? No
      Is it an ethnicity? No
      Is it a religion? No
      Is it a culture? No
      Is it a language? No

      I have often heard that “America” is an idea and this idea has no firm meaning. The meaning of “America” is dependent on various individuals or groups. That is to say, there is no common understanding of the idea of “America” among its 320 million inhabitants. The same can be said of the Constitution. There is no common understanding regarding the meaning of the Constitution among the citizens of the United States.

      So, in summary, “America” is not a people of a common race, ethnicity, religion, culture, or language. “America” is an idea that 320 million citizens don’t agree on its meaning. In other words, “America” is nothing. Why should I or anyone else be patriotic towards nothing?

      • James Owen

        Dixie is something. It’s home. It’s us.

        • Julian Wright

          Wow. Such Yankee indecency. All that just because we want to govern ourselves. I really don’t want to be governed by you foreigners at all!!!!!

          • Virginian Secessionist

            Any Southron still on the fence about independence need only see Jimmy’s posts here. That will reassure them right quick that we do not belong in union with vile barbarians such as that…

            • Julian Wright

              I Strongly agree. I’ve been reading a few of his comments on this article. They are volger and horrid at best. I can’t wait for God to liberate the South.

    • Mark Saint

      Actually we are States under a common pact. I will wear your “traitor” bage with pride.

      • Long Live Dixie

        I don’t consider an involuntary union to be a common pact.

        • Marcusjohn

          What are you talking about the vast majority of people do not want to go back to the south of 50 or 150 years least on secede. You guys are very entertaining and the alternative history on this site quite interesting. If the United State fail it would be quite interesting to see you guys and the white nationalist fight it out for land and resources.

          • Virginian Secessionist

            I have yet to see any alternative history here; only fact-based history.

          • Tom Sanders

            If, I think you mean when…….nothing last forever.

        • Mark Saint

          Correct. I meant before the war for Southern Independence.

      • Long Live Dixie

        From the perspective of Rome, Hermann (Arminius) was a traitor. From the perspective of his fellow Teutons, he was a patriot.

        Today’s politically correct zombies are just as unimaginative as yesteryear’s Romans. They can’t think outside the box of statism. They genuinely can’t understand why someone would choose blood ties over artificial loyalties to a foreign empire.

      • Mark Saint

        Is that the best response you can come up with? Your statement reflects an immense amount of animosity. Are you a Christian? Funny how we do not wish harm to our fellow citizens, but you in your response only show hatred. Your beliefs are all the more reason not to want mutual association through government.

        • Virginian Secessionist

          Hatred is all that they have. It is the driving force of their existence, and if we deny them their right to hate us, we deny them existence. Therefore, they hate us all the more…

          • Jimmy_Sr…

            Hatred for our country is all you morons seem to display on a daily basis. How did that Operation American Spring go sweetie? We could all see it was an utter failure because guess what, people like you are only about 1% of the population. The rest of believe in our country and the principles it was founded on. We are not a Christian nation. If you want to live in a Theocracy move to Iran.

            • Julian Wright

              Perhaps not in the North, but we are a christian nation in the South. If you want your secular/muslim government so badly that’s fine by me. Just leave the Christians in the South alone. Thank you

            • Virginian Secessionist

              With Founding Father Light Horse Harry Lee I say, ‘Virginia is my country’. And I love my country dearly. I love it enough to want to see it removed from union with the likes of you…

          • Julian Wright

            I agree. All they have is their god Lucifer. All they can do is hate our child-like urge to be free and govern ourselves as our “LOVING” creator has given us.

        • Jimmy_Sr…

          I’m not a Christian, I am a Patriot and I do not take kindly to people like yourselves who think its ok to spit all over our country to push your ideology upon the rest of us. You don’t like America then get the fuck out, plain and simple.

          • Mark Saint

            You then are making our point, thank you. If we don’t like America get out. That is exactly what we are doing. Now as far as the land goes, the region of Alabama has been my nation for thousands of years. Part of our family line is of Creek decent. So where should the Creek go? As far as pushing our ideology on you we are not, we want no part of you. You are a hateful individual. I will stand with The Christ on Judgment Day and you will stand alone. Good luck.

  • Anti-Federalist

    I read that LAMAR has taken down the billboard. Supposedly people complained and were offended. I am quite sure that LAMAR would have no problem with putting up a billboard with two men kissing each other in the mouth. However, a single but yet powerful word, secede, is to offensive to put up.

    • Logan Smith

      Tell me it isn’t so.

  • James Owen

    Disqus sure brings in the trolls. Not like the old comment setup.

    • Logan Smith

      I like Disqus, though. I don’t have to sign up to a hundred different comment sections just to post one reply. Jumping around from website to website, Disqus makes it really easy to communicate, and keep up with comrades.

      • James Owen

        I agree with you on disqus. I just don’t care much for trolls or third party arguments that spill over onto this blog. They live in a totally different world than I do. I’ve been a Southern Nationalist since 1979, when my History teacher smashed Plymouth Rock with the hammer of truth. Yankeedom ain’t even on my map. Its just a hostile, foreign nation, populated by schizoids and narcissistic, passive-agressive bullies.

        • Michael

          James, I know they are a pain. I have banned a bunch of them. Just today I banned two more. Unfortunately, I work a lot these days so I have less time to monitor the comments than I would like.

        • Logan Smith

          You an’t wrong there, brother.

    • Long Live Dixie

      I don’t mind the occasional troll. For our members who don’t post elsewhere, it’s good to hear the hatred and rage that our foe has for us. It keeps us on our feet and it lessens sentimental notions that sometimes pop up in SN circles of reconciling with Yankees someday. It helps radicalise our people.

  • James Owen

    Thanks, Michael.

    • Virginian Secessionist

      Am I the only one who still isn’t seeing Michael’s posts?

      • Long Live Dixie

        No. I can’t see them either.

      • James Owen

        No you’re not. I saw enough in newest comments, to respond.

      • Logan Smith

        I thought it was just me, why can’t we see his posts?

  • James Owen

    I’ve noticed that trolls never comment on the complex articles. Only on simple things like this. It just proves that they live in a world of buzz words, catch phrases, and trendy slogans.No real thought involved here. But the arrogance and imperial sense of entitlement is irritating and downright insulting.

    • Logan Smith

      It’s like they don’t *want* to actually learn what our views are, and why we want to be independent.

      • James Owen

        I think it’s more a case of simple minds operating within simple memes. Yellin’ “Racism®” , “Treason®” or “Sedition®” is easier than wrapping their puny minds around the Golden Circle concept, Classical political theory, or the fact that George Washington was not a New Englander. Besides as Professor Wilson said; “Anyone who rejects the inestimable value and benefits of being ruled over by Yankees is either evil or insane.”

        • Logan Smith

          I actually wish some of us wouldn’t bring up race issues, just because I hate being called a White Supremacist. I’m a Southern Nationalist, all I call for is a free South Carolina. I could care less what system we had after secession, just as long as a US flag does not fly over mine.

          It’s interesting talking about history and genetics, and we really need to confront certain social and cultural issues, but talking about race just gives too much ammunition to our enemies and detracts dissenters who are not that deep into what’s going on around them. That’s just my 2 cents.

          • James Owen

            Agreed 100% But these folks are working off the New England moral/political paradigm. Race is the chink in the South’s political armour. Therefore, it’s the central element of neo-Yankee/Puritan political thought. They accuse us of living in the past. But they’re the ones still carrying out the political campaign of the Whig Party of the 1850s. If you pay attention to what they say, you’ll realise they’re working to the timetable of 1860. Head on over to the Abbeville Institute site. There’s a four part series there called: “A Bostonian on The Causes of The War.” Awful danged enlightening. Especially concerning the political psychology of Northerners vs. Southrons.

          • Long Live Dixie

            Who cares what they call us? They’ll call us white supremacists (whatever that means), racists, haters, ignorant, inbred, trailer trash, and naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews. If they stop calling us names, then it’s a sign we’re not doing a good job. Name calling is all they have.

            • Jimmy_Sr…

              I call you a toothless uneducated dumbass redneck hillbilly

            • Virginian Secessionist

              Just like a 5th grader…

          • Jimmy_Sr…

            Southern Nationalist is another term for White Supremacist

      • Virginian Secessionist

        Um… clearly you have no concept of either the Constitution or history. Else you would not have said that first sentence.

        • James Owen

          Ask him which Constitution? The one written by James Madison and based on the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia? Or the one written by Guido and Vinnie in Joisey? Yankees seem to have an almost genetic inability to understand the Constitution. But that’s not surprising, considering it was written by Virginians and rooted in classical Republicanism. A concept foreign to the Puritan mind.

          • Jimmy_Sr…

            Rednecks seem to think that they have a right to secede, but they do not. Like I told your butt buddy take up arms against the United States and see what happens next, I dare
            you. We put you dogs down once, we will gladly do it again. The south
            may try to rise again but it will fall very quickly.

            • Virginian Secessionist

              Thomas Jefferson would disagree with you…

        • Jimmy_Sr…

          I do have a very clear concept of the Constitution, you apparently do not. Take up arms against the United States and see what happens next, I dare you. We put you dogs down once, we will gladly do it again. The south may try to rise again but it will fall very quickly.

    • James Owen

      By commenting here, what do you hope to accomplish?

      • Logan Smith

        He’s just trying to aggravate. The best thing to do is ignore him like all the others who’ve come here to scold, over the years.

        • James Owen

          I figgered as much. But when you ask them to explain themselves, they won’t. I know I’m dealing with juvenile delinquents.

          • Logan Smith

            They don’t understand the concept of debate, only ad hominem.

            • Jimmy_Sr…

              You don’t understand the concept of a simple education.

          • Jimmy_Sr…

            Actually sweetie I’m still here.

      • Jimmy_Sr…

        By attempting to secede from the US, what do you hope to accomplish other than guaranteeing death by stupidity.

    • Virginian Secessionist

      And here, class, we have a typical specimen of the species Yankeeus Stoogeus. Note the boorish attitude. Note the prevalence of one and two-syllable vocabulary, with an impressive cameo of a single three-syllable word.

      This particular breed of the larger ‘Flib’ group is particularly renowned for its inability to spew forth anything but bile. Note the vulgarity of its speech, the simplicity of its thought, and the paucity of reason and logic. It is a primitive species, one which knows only brutish violence as a means of accomplishing its objectives.

      The leading theory of their origins is that they de-volved from the earlier specimens of Frankus Revolutionarius and Puritanicus Major.

      • James Owen

        The reference to lead pipes gives it away.

      • James Owen

        Furthermore, had it been alive in 1861, it wouldn’t have bothered to enlist in the Yankee army. These “Patriotic” types are never to be found in line at the recruiting office.

        • Jimmy_Sr…

          Actually stupid, I am prior service and a patriot. Patriot means fighting for your country and equality for all regardless of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation. Not fighting for the rights of the White Christian man and your home state.

          • Rob

            He put sexual orientation in there… Must be a homosexual. Remember the good old days when the gays stayed in the closet. Now they want special treatment just cause they pack fudge. Always looking for approval and justification for their deviant lifestyle. Because they know its wrong. Why don’t you just go have a parade or something.

      • Jimmy_Sr…

        And here, class, we have a typical specimen of the species Dumbassus Redneckus. Note the uneducated vocabulary and lack of an intelligent thought.

        This particular breed of the larger ‘conservitard’
        group is particularly renowned for its inability to spew forth anything
        but bile. Note the vulgarity of its speech, the simplicity of its
        thought, and the paucity of reason and logic. It is a primitive species,
        one which knows only brutish violence as a means of accomplishing its
        objectives.

        The leading theory of their origins is that they
        sprouted up from the earlier specimens of Neanderthals that didn’t evolve like the rest of homo sapiens.

        • Virginian Secessionist

          Since mimicry is the sincerest form of flattery, consider me flattered at your attempt, weak though it be, to mimic me. :)

  • James Owen



Images

Feds out of Florida footer