Welcome to Southern Nationalist Network

Member Login

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Sign Up!

Dr Michael Hill vs Neo-con John Podhoretz

December 17, 2012
By

Dr Michael Hill, president of the League of the South, had an interesting exchange today with a leading Neo-con warmonger, John Podhoretz. Notice how anti-Southern and anti-White Mr Podhoretz is, despite claiming (falsely) to be conservative. Dr Hill copied the exchange on a League Facebook page:

My Twitter conversation today with a Neo-Con big fish. It’s nice to know who your real enemy is (and please note his last response to me):

John Podhoretz
You know what’s comparable to the Gettysburg Address? Nothing.

4h Michael Hill @MichaelHill51

@jpodhoretz Yes, as Mencken told us, it’s all fairy tale Bull Shit. We Southern Nationalists have no truck with you Trotskyite neocons.

3h John Podhoretz John Podhoretz @jpodhoretz

@MichaelHill51 nice to know Lincoln was a neocon. At least he wasn’t a 21st century man longing for slavery

2h Michael Hill Michael Hill @MichaelHill51

@jpodhoretz You neocons seems bent on enslaving the world . . . at least that part of it you don’t destroy first with your incessant wars.

2h John Podhoretz John Podhoretz @jpodhoretz

@MichaelHill51 Not the whole world. Just you.
2:02 PM – 17 Dec 12

My last response to him was: “Bring it on . . .”

Share

Tags: , , , ,

7 Responses to Dr Michael Hill vs Neo-con John Podhoretz

  1. ossian on December 17, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    Interesting that Dr. Hill is even on Podhoretz’s radar. What’s that all about?

  2. Virginian Secessionist on December 17, 2012 at 10:00 pm

    “Not the whole world. Just you.” At least the man is honest. Of course, we already knew that was their plan. But it is nice to hear them admit it. I love how the simple fact that we want secession and aren’t egalitarian suddenly means that all we want to do is enslave the blacks. These buffoons won’t even give us the time of day, nor listen to reason. When we say “secession” they hear “racism.” And they claim to be conservative. This is why I reject that label. It has been thoroughly tainted. I prefer the term “traditionalist,” but I’m quite content with “reactionary” as well. I was once labeled on a forum as “that crazy reactionary guy” and took the title proudly as my own in defiance, though I simply used “Crazy Reactionary” for my “rank” on the forum.

    • VirginiaCavalier on December 18, 2012 at 9:30 pm

      At some point I’m going to have to stop agreeing with your comments for the sake of it…

  3. Confederate Papist on December 18, 2012 at 2:11 am

    No, John Podhoretz…it’s you we need to get rid of. You and your yankee filth!

  4. Dixiegirl on December 18, 2012 at 10:39 am

    Mr. Podhoretz, of all people (right?), should not have forgotten Genocide is illegal.

    If one’s people survive a Genocide, it would seem that would make them sensitive to this issue. Why is Mr. Podhoretz insensitive to such an issue?

  5. Dixiegirl on December 18, 2012 at 10:40 am

    Dr. Hill, go ahead and ask—- it would get interesting.

  6. Dixiegirl on December 18, 2012 at 10:42 am

    Oh— and if he feels Lincoln’s stated Genocidal policy of ‘total war”/ “scorched earth” / “leave no remnant” / ‘the end justifies the means’ was no enough, already—- when IS IT enough?

Leave a Reply



Images