Comments on: Mercer ‘White History’ flyer ‘controversial’ & divisive’?

By: mike360000

mike360000 — Mon, 29 Oct 2012 04:18:19 +0000

cinaed57, you took the words right out of my fingers….
But the simple question is; Why is something fair for one and not another? That’s the bottom line they will not answer. Although we know the answer we cannot acknowledge it without it making us targets for even more radical anti-white attacks. It boils down to the real “racists” being the ones doing the name calling in the first place.

Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

By: cinaed57

cinaed57 — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:23:58 +0000

I wouldn’t say it is “ignorance” but much worse. I contend it is quite deliberate, and designed to intimidate whites on the basis of their Christian conscience to be quiet and submit to the ideology they are attempting to make dominant. As such it is a part of the overall Gramscian tactic to attack a part of a society, this case the dominant white culture which is Christian, for the purpose of advancing Marxist ideology in the targeted culture. The rejoinder whites must employ in this attack is that failing to accommodate whites as the state as accommodated others is to exclude whites on the basis of their color and to explicitly discriminate against them on the basis of their color, culture, and historic contributions to the development of western civilization. As such it is illegal, bigoted, and fundamentally anti-white and practicing hatred. It is un-neighborly behavior.

By: Virginian Secessionist

Virginian Secessionist — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:36:11 +0000

I love how anything pro-White is automatically labeled as “racist” by them. As though the fact that I’m proud of my European ancestry and my Southron heritage, and the fact that I *don’t* want to see my people destroyed automatically means I must *hate* everyone else who isn’t like me. The ignorance of these people is astounding.