Dr Thomas DiLorenzo, author of The Real Lincoln and Lincoln Unmasked, comments on LRC today:
All Lincoln movies are government propaganda films designed to prop up and glorify the welfare/warfare state by associating the current regime, Democrat or Republican, with the sacrilegiously deified Dishonest Abe. They are always filled with a blizzard of lies and half-truths, as is most “Lincoln scholarship” in general. The Daily Bell comments on the latest statist propaganda film by Steven Spielberg.
A few days ago, Dr DiLorenzo wrote a more lengthy piece for LRC about Ken Burn’s The Civil War, which included the following analysis:
Burns really lets the cat out of the bag… where he quotes a U.S. Army Major named Sullivan Ballou, who wrote his wife during the “Civil War” about why he thought the war was being fought. It was not to free the slaves but to defend the Lincoln regime in Washington, D.C. “American civilization now leans on the triumph of the government,” he wrote, and “I am willing . .. to lay down all my joys in this life, to help maintain this government . . .” What a job the military propagandists of his day must have done on the hapless Major Ballou (assuming that the letter is authentic).
How odd that anyone would equate the killing of some 850,000 Americans (the latest estimate of “Civil War” deaths), the bombing, burning, and destruction of entire cities, the mass killing of tens of thousands of civilians, the rape, pillage and plunder of thousands more, the suspension of Habeas Corpus and imprisonment of tens of thousands of Northern civilians, the shutting down of hundreds of opposition newspapers in the North, military conscription, the daily execution of deserters (by the Lincoln regime), and the rigging of Northern elections as “civilization.” And how odd that anyone would think that the secession of a state (or states), under the correct belief that the union of the founding fathers was a voluntary union, would somehow “destroy” the government in Washington. In fact, the government in Washington grew exponentially after the Southern states seceded, fielding the largest and best-equipped army in world history up to that point.
The obvious purpose of Burns’s The Civil War, as with Lincoln mythology in general, is to spread propaganda that props up state power.
Also see: DiLorenzo on Spielberg’s Lincoln movie



















Sue me, but I actually think that the upcoming Lincoln movie looks really good, cinematic-ly speaking. The trailer was excellent and the actor portraying Lincoln brought a great deal of force and emotion to the role. But would I ever like to see a Jefferson Davis movie…
As long as the Jefferson Davis movie were done right. One that showed the truth about the man and the cause which he upheld to his dying day. Personally, I would love to see a well-acted portrayal of his farewell speech to the US Senate.
No plans to see the Lincoln propaganda movie.
I’d rather spend the money and go to Mississippi and see Beauvoir.