<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better off without Thompson &amp; Flynn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://southernnationalist.com/blog/2012/09/28/better-off-without-thompson-flynn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://southernnationalist.com/blog/2012/09/28/better-off-without-thompson-flynn/</link>
	<description>Independence &#38; Identity!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike360000</title>
		<link>http://southernnationalist.com/blog/2012/09/28/better-off-without-thompson-flynn/comment-page-1/#comment-20741</link>
		<dc:creator>mike360000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southernnationalist.com/blog/?p=25021#comment-20741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democrat Party is far different after Lincoln&#039;s War than before. Because the Party was taken over and controlled by Northerners after the war it became a totally different political entity. The problem here is it took much time for the Northern liberals to gain total control of the party. Today we see the Democratic for what it really is and has been since the war. A work in progress, liberals trying to out-liberal the progressives which is the Republican Party.

Where all the writers, Flynn, Coulter....etc... misses the boat is that the Democrat Party changed ideology after the war and is not the same party. Meanwhile they also miss the fact that it is actually the Republicans that are the original liberals but chose to use the word Progressive in their campaigns years ago because they thought the term liberal didn&#039;t apply to them 1: Because it was sociably acceptable in the usa at the time. 2: Because of the word&#039;s use and meaning as it was used in Europe. 

From how we understand Republicans we know that today the Republican Party is actually controlled by neo-conservatives which is close to being of NAZI ideology, that it is NOT true conservatism. We also know the Democrat Party has matured to show itself as being of the Marxist ideology, with BOTH parties following the tenets of Fabian Marxism. 

I ask; how can any of those writers be correct in anything they say and write, including all liberals and neo-conservatives, when they are already biased against Southern Heritage and culture to begin with. This includes Southern politics as well as social developments/skills? They can&#039;t, they&#039;re ALL wrong! Yet neither side will admit their true past history, each blaming the other. 

Michael-- Deo Vindicabamur]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrat Party is far different after Lincoln&#8217;s War than before. Because the Party was taken over and controlled by Northerners after the war it became a totally different political entity. The problem here is it took much time for the Northern liberals to gain total control of the party. Today we see the Democratic for what it really is and has been since the war. A work in progress, liberals trying to out-liberal the progressives which is the Republican Party.</p>
<p>Where all the writers, Flynn, Coulter&#8230;.etc&#8230; misses the boat is that the Democrat Party changed ideology after the war and is not the same party. Meanwhile they also miss the fact that it is actually the Republicans that are the original liberals but chose to use the word Progressive in their campaigns years ago because they thought the term liberal didn&#8217;t apply to them 1: Because it was sociably acceptable in the usa at the time. 2: Because of the word&#8217;s use and meaning as it was used in Europe. </p>
<p>From how we understand Republicans we know that today the Republican Party is actually controlled by neo-conservatives which is close to being of NAZI ideology, that it is NOT true conservatism. We also know the Democrat Party has matured to show itself as being of the Marxist ideology, with BOTH parties following the tenets of Fabian Marxism. </p>
<p>I ask; how can any of those writers be correct in anything they say and write, including all liberals and neo-conservatives, when they are already biased against Southern Heritage and culture to begin with. This includes Southern politics as well as social developments/skills? They can&#8217;t, they&#8217;re ALL wrong! Yet neither side will admit their true past history, each blaming the other. </p>
<p>Michael&#8211; Deo Vindicabamur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://southernnationalist.com/blog/2012/09/28/better-off-without-thompson-flynn/comment-page-1/#comment-20711</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southernnationalist.com/blog/?p=25021#comment-20711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad you pointed that out, Anti-Federalist, that Coulter plays the same tried-and-failed games that Flynn plays. I don&#039;t know why anyone pays attention to these folks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you pointed that out, Anti-Federalist, that Coulter plays the same tried-and-failed games that Flynn plays. I don&#8217;t know why anyone pays attention to these folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Federalist</title>
		<link>http://southernnationalist.com/blog/2012/09/28/better-off-without-thompson-flynn/comment-page-1/#comment-20710</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Federalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southernnationalist.com/blog/?p=25021#comment-20710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael wrote:

&quot; In fact, if Flynn’s article was actually a defense of Southerners it would be welcomed; however, it is not. Rather than challenging Thompson’s portrayal of White Southern Christians as backwards, evil, hateful devils, Flynn pulls out the tried-and-failed Republican tactic of arguing that the Leftists are the real ‘racists.’ &quot;

Funny that you wrote this Michael. Look what the northeast Yankee hyper partisan Republican siren, Ann Coulter, wrote yesterday:

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-09-26.html#read_more 
 
&quot;Democrats spent the first century of this country&#039;s existence refusing to treat black people like human beings, and the second refusing to treat them like adults. 

After fighting the Civil War to continue enslaving black people and then subjecting newly freed black Americans to vicious, humiliating Jim Crow laws and Ku Klux Klan violence, Democrats set about frantically rewriting their own ugly history. 

Step 1: Switch &quot;Democrat&quot; to &quot;Southerner&quot;; 

Step 2: Switch &quot;Southerner&quot; to &quot;conservative Democrat&quot;; 

Step 3: Switch &quot;conservative Democrat&quot; to &quot;conservative.&quot; 

Contrary to liberal folklore, the Democratic segregationists were not all Southern -- and they were certainly not conservative. They were dyed-in-the-wool liberal Democrats on all the litmus-test issues of their day. &quot;

It is sad that so many Southern conservatives love this woman.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael wrote:</p>
<p>&#8221; In fact, if Flynn’s article was actually a defense of Southerners it would be welcomed; however, it is not. Rather than challenging Thompson’s portrayal of White Southern Christians as backwards, evil, hateful devils, Flynn pulls out the tried-and-failed Republican tactic of arguing that the Leftists are the real ‘racists.’ &#8221;</p>
<p>Funny that you wrote this Michael. Look what the northeast Yankee hyper partisan Republican siren, Ann Coulter, wrote yesterday:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-09-26.html#read_more" rel="nofollow">http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-09-26.html#read_more</a> </p>
<p>&#8220;Democrats spent the first century of this country&#8217;s existence refusing to treat black people like human beings, and the second refusing to treat them like adults. </p>
<p>After fighting the Civil War to continue enslaving black people and then subjecting newly freed black Americans to vicious, humiliating Jim Crow laws and Ku Klux Klan violence, Democrats set about frantically rewriting their own ugly history. </p>
<p>Step 1: Switch &#8220;Democrat&#8221; to &#8220;Southerner&#8221;; </p>
<p>Step 2: Switch &#8220;Southerner&#8221; to &#8220;conservative Democrat&#8221;; </p>
<p>Step 3: Switch &#8220;conservative Democrat&#8221; to &#8220;conservative.&#8221; </p>
<p>Contrary to liberal folklore, the Democratic segregationists were not all Southern &#8212; and they were certainly not conservative. They were dyed-in-the-wool liberal Democrats on all the litmus-test issues of their day. &#8221;</p>
<p>It is sad that so many Southern conservatives love this woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
