That’s true, Dixiegirl. In my experience they tend to react almost violently when you do so. It’s as if they feel they were somehow tricked. Using their terms against them to expose their anti-White bias/agenda is beyond the pale. Such people can generally not be reached. If they are White, the guilt they have runs too deep. However, it is possible to reach more and more younger people – the ones who have yet to discover their own world-view. Recent polls show that half of Millennial Whites feel they are discriminated against because of their race. This percentage will likely only grow as the anti-White agenda becomes ever more blatant and our exposé of them gains momentum. The more the term ‘anti-White’ becomes mainstream, the better.

There are ALL KINDS of wasps (rich, poor, honest, liars, etc, etc.) It’s AN ETHNIC GROUP.

So much energy was put into their vilification that, often, even white nationalists can’t really hear it.

IN REALITY, most of the COUNTRY was protestant northwest european. 99% at the American revolution. And through most of its history (only one catholic signer, etc.)

Bob Whitaker would call much of the above “Temporal Provincialism”—- they talk, clearly not even realizing that the “non-wasps” were a relatively small minority (truly!) THEREFORE, they had all the jobs.

It’s like in the more Scandanavian North now— if you find a 95% “white town” you will find those of North Euro descent will HAVE ALL THE JOBS!

The displacement of this initial population (often by policies intended to displace, replace, and sometimes even eradicate them) is genocide.

The South —as an area with some of the most generational people in that ethnic group, with many Scots-anglo-saxons, usually poorer ones, lol— is attacked as a sub-group of the wasp group, imo.

—But the comments on PBS do say more than they mean to expose. Thanks for posting!