National Public Radio (NPR) will now moderate all comments prior to publication on their website. Apparently half of their (mostly upper-middle class White liberal) audience supports more moderation. We have no choice but to fund this generally anti-Southern and anti-White network (they take part of their funding from our tax money) but they will now selectively post our comments. ‘Hate speech’ (a term which means everything and nothing at the same time) as well ‘sexist’ and ‘racist‘ comments are expressly forbidden. Expect only politically-correct comments to be approved.
By the way, we at SNN do not force everyone to pay for our website the way that NPR does. We also have a very different comment policy. We require that the first comment from a new reader to the site be approved by the webmaster. This is to weed out spam (once upon a time we did not do this and we were bombarded with a massive amount of spam). After that initial approval, all comments are automatically approved. We will go in and edit comments to remove profanity. As well, any comment with two or more links in it is held for approval (this also is to weed out spam). That is essentially it to our comment policy. We reserve the right to remove user names at our discretion but then again, as mentioned, we are a completely private website. We get no public funding, unlike NPR. And we are upfront about our (Southern nationalist) agenda, unlike NPR which pretends to be neutral and balanced.
Update: If there was ever any doubt about the anti-White bias of NPR just check out one of the stories they have featured on their on their website at the moment. It’s called ‘The End of WASP-Dominated Politics.’ The article by Alan Greenblatt notes:
Fifty years ago, the military, foreign service and top political offices were all dominated by WASPs — white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants.
“The minimal but unrelenting qualification was to be white, Anglo-Saxon in heritage and Protestant in religion,” the cultural critic Joseph Epstein writes in his book Snobbery. “If one was Catholic, or surely Irish Catholic, or Jewish, forget about it; if one was black, don’t even think about it.”
Because of the country’s changing population and shifts in educational opportunities, none of that is true anymore.
Of course, the country’s population is not changing – rather, it was changed. There is a big difference. One is a natural development. The other is a deliberate policy of genocide, as we have written about extensively on SNN (see here, here, here and here).
Also, check out some of the anti-White comments from NPR readers.
Scooby Poo writes:
Really looking forward to fewer old white males running for office
(and hey, I’m an old white male)
But the real breakthrough will be when an atheist/agnostic can openly run for office.
Gabriel Mayer writes:
Problem is that while President Obama represents a forward move in political tolerance, Romney & Ryan are a regression from WASP to just pretty & rich white boys.
Miss M writes:
Having minorities in positions of power generally makes the majority act even worse in the attempt to reclaim power. Hence, the last four years.
Fly Butterfly writes:
I agree with that. I think watching a black man being sworn in as POTUS scared the crap out of some very narrow-minded people. This is why they never gave him a chance. Had he been the -exact- man (educated, prosperous, good family life, great American dream story AND protestant) they would have reacted differently, Democrat or not.
Mystery Meat writes:
i [sic] want diversity. i [sic] want all manner of minorities elected to public office in numbers that reflect our demography. that’s [sic] what representative democracy is all about.
Skip Mendler writes:
I was gonna say “AND NOT A MOMENT TOO SOON…” – but then again, I have to admit there were *some* members of the WASP elite who still believed in notions like “noblesse oblige,” a concept that seems foreign to, say, Mitt Romney
Ian Brown writes:
It’s going to be very refreshing when the old rich white “baby boomers” release their hold on…oh I don’t know…everything!



















Minorities have acted worse and have been less capable. They attempted to gain retribution rather than equality. Equality always was and and always will be the mantra of pretentious agitators trying to place you under their foot.
People become somewhat uncomfortable when you point out the racism in these comments— the hatred of protestant peoples, and northwest europeans. (wasps)
There are ALL KINDS of wasps (rich, poor, honest, liars, etc, etc.) It’s AN ETHNIC GROUP.
So much energy was put into their vilification that, often, even white nationalists can’t really hear it.
IN REALITY, most of the COUNTRY was protestant northwest european. 99% at the American revolution. And through most of its history (only one catholic signer, etc.)
Bob Whitaker would call much of the above “Temporal Provincialism”—- they talk, clearly not even realizing that the “non-wasps” were a relatively small minority (truly!) THEREFORE, they had all the jobs.
It’s like in the more Scandanavian North now— if you find a 95% “white town” you will find those of North Euro descent will HAVE ALL THE JOBS!
The displacement of this initial population (often by policies intended to displace, replace, and sometimes even eradicate them) is genocide.
The South —as an area with some of the most generational people in that ethnic group, with many Scots-anglo-saxons, usually poorer ones, lol— is attacked as a sub-group of the wasp group, imo.
—But the comments on PBS do say more than they mean to expose. Thanks for posting!
‘People become somewhat uncomfortable when you point out the racism in these comments— the hatred of protestant peoples, and northwest europeans. (wasps)’
That’s true, Dixiegirl. In my experience they tend to react almost violently when you do so. It’s as if they feel they were somehow tricked. Using their terms against them to expose their anti-White bias/agenda is beyond the pale. Such people can generally not be reached. If they are White, the guilt they have runs too deep. However, it is possible to reach more and more younger people – the ones who have yet to discover their own world-view. Recent polls show that half of Millennial Whites feel they are discriminated against because of their race. This percentage will likely only grow as the anti-White agenda becomes ever more blatant and our exposé of them gains momentum. The more the term ‘anti-White’ becomes mainstream, the better.