Candidate says he supports 'fair' immigration laws
We have another indication from Mitt Romney’s campaign that the Republican presidential candidate is fully on board with White genocide. This is not hyperbole. Under international law genocide need not be violent. Article II, Section C of the 1948 Genocide Convention, which has been adopted by 142 countries, defines genocide as: ‘Deliberately inflicting on [a racial, ethnic, cultural or religious] group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.’ This is precisely what the GOP standard-bearer endorses according to a Reuters article written by Steven Holland. He writes:
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney will pledge to Hispanics on Monday that if elected he will fix the troubled U.S. immigration system in an appeal to a rising voter bloc that overwhelmingly favors Democratic President Barack Obama.
Looking to rebound after a tough week in which he fell behind Obama in the polls, Romney will couple his immigration promises with a commitment to get a handle on America’s problem of rising national debt and massive budget deficits.
…Romney’s immigration remarks to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce will be aimed at shoring up a weakness in his candidacy: the fact that a huge majority of Hispanics support Obama.
…”I believe we can all agree that what we need are fair and enforceable immigration laws that will stem the flow of illegal immigration, while strengthening legal immigration,” Romney will say.
Notice that last quote by Romney. He wants ‘fair’ immigration laws that will strengthen legal immigration. Considering that nearly all immigration into the United States today is from the Third World, Romney is clearly endorsing more Third World immigration. He simply wants the immigrants to have government papers.
Let’s go back to the definition of genocide. Policies which bring about the destruction of a people in whole or in part are genocide. The US population prior to the disastrous 1965 immigration act was roughly ninety percent White European. The people who pushed that act, including Ted Kennedy, promised that the demographic balance in the US would not be changed. They lied. Recently, the US media reported that Whites are now a minority among small children in the US. We are told that within a short period of time Whites will no longer be a majority in a country that was ninety percent White only a few decades ago. What we are talking about is genocide. Now we have word from the Romney camp that he supports this anti-White agenda. Romney wants to strengthen legal immigration, he says, meaning that he wants a less White America. Such policies, if implemented over the long-run, will obviously result in a non-White USA. Mitt Romney may say he supports ‘strengthening legal immigration’ but what that means is that he is anti-White.
From a Southern nationalist perspective, Romney’s proposal to ‘strengthen legal immigration’ would be a disaster for all native groups in the South. The various regional and micro-cultures which are already under siege throughout the Southern States would be under even more demographic pressure. For any cultural group or people to exist in the long run, they must have a homeland. Romney clearly puts cheap labour and Hispanic votes ahead of any concern for the well-being and survival of Southerners.
Update: Holly Bailey confirmed Romney’s commitment to supporting an anti-White agenda, writing today in a Yahoo News article:
Romney vowed to work with both Democrats and Republicans to achieve “a legal immigration system that is fair and efficient,” and would start by strengthening security on the nation’s borders. He said he would also “shift” diversity visas to “instead bring together immediate family members” and would allow immigrants who achieved an “advanced degree” to stay here.
“I want them to stay here, so I’d staple a green card to their diploma,” Romney said. “America is a nation of immigrants, and immigration is essential to our economic growth and prosperity. One million immigrants legally enter America every year—the largest number of any country in the world. I like that,” he added. “I want to preserve our heritage of robust legal immigration. And I want to make sure that those who abide by the law and wait in line to immigrate here legally are not at a disadvantage.”