The USA Today has an alarming new article out by Haya El Nasser called ‘Diversity spreading to all corners of the US.’ El Nasser’s article approvingly reports on the demise of White communities around the United States and the growth of non-White numbers. He writes:
Communities where whites are the majority are still the norm (82.6%), but those where they dominate are gradually disappearing, according to an analysis of Census data by Penn State’s Population Research Institute. In 1980, about two-thirds of all places were at least 90% white. By 2010, only a third were. The number of places where no group is a majority has more than quintupled.
…”It’s really the kids who are driving all this,” says Kenneth Johnson, demographer at the University of New Hampshire’s Carsey Institute. “As population continues to age and minority child population increases, these numbers are going to go up fast.”
The impact is striking in rural areas where white populations are shrinking as young people leave and the elderly who stay die. When Hispanics and Asians move in, minority kids are born and alter the dynamics. Many rural schools have added English-as-a-second-language classes and social service agencies have hired translators.
“There are literally hundreds of American counties that would be losing population if it were not for minority growth,” Johnson says. “This diversity is bringing them young people they had been losing for a long time and new opportunities.”
Notice how the article conspicuously leaves out any of the negatives associated with ‘diversity,’ such as increased crime rates, poverty, worsened schools, corrupt local governments, added social tension, etc. Those who live near a great deal of ‘diversity’ can no doubt report at length about the drawbacks of bringing Third World populations into our communities. However, El Nasser completely leaves out this part of the picture.
Also notice in the article how ‘diversity’ brings young people and ‘new opportunities.’ Of course, the young people are not their own and the opportunities are not for them; they are for the foreigners replacing them. This gets at the heart of the matter. This article is clearly anti-White. Elites such as United Nations migration chief Peter Sutherland have long called for policy changes such as the 1965 immigration act which breaks up homogeneous population and replaces Western people with non-Westerners. The purposeful replacement (and this is purposeful because it is due to US Federal immigration policy) of one people (based on national, ethnic, racial or religious grounds) is defined by international law as genocide. What is going on in the United States is clearly genocide: Whites are being replaced by non-Whites. Haya El Nasser obviously approves of this.
Also see: Third World Chicago; Third World California going bankrupt; Third World Detroit now dumping ground for dead bodies; Third World America and The impossibility of ‘assimilating’ a Third World majority
Recent Comments