Mayor wants a Third World America
The billionaire mayor of New York City who has fought to ban salt, carbonated beverages and smoking, now has another brilliant idea which he wants to inflict upon people: open borders to the Third World. If Mayor Michael Bloomberg has his way, the United States would welcome any of the billions of destitute people in the Third World who wanted to come to the world’s richest country to work (or live on the social welfare system). The Chicago Sun-Times has the story:
Bloomberg says that “opening the doors to all who want to come here and work” is a cost-free way to help the economy quickly, noting that immigration is “what built this country.”
Billionaire NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg wants a Third World America
Of course, immigration did not build the United States. The US was built by European settlers who brought Western Civilisation to a new continent. Until 1965 immigration was restricted to fellow Europeans who could easily assimilate into the general population, keeping the US a Western country. Since 1965, when the doors to the Third World were partially opened, States such as Texas, California and others have been largely re-made in the image of the Third World. The effect of the current US immigration policy is to displace and ultimate replace the people who actually created the US (which is genocide under international law) and made it into the strongest, richest country on Earth. Areas which have since been re-populated by people from the Third World unsurprisingly look very much like the Third World – and for all intents and purposes are. Bloomberg’s plan to have completely open borders would ensure that Third Worlders would quickly become the overwhelming majority in North America and would dominate our society, system of government, schools, etc. The Western nature of our culture would be washed away rather quickly in a tide of destitute, unskilled people from Latin America, Africa, India, Asia, etc. The transformation that is well under way now which is turning the USA into a Third World land would be radically sped up.
Thanks to Occidental Dissent for the link!
“opening the doors to all who want to come here and work” is a cost-free way to help the economy quickly, noting that immigration is “what built this country.
Mr. Bubble head is correct, sorta. It was immigrants that came to this continent. But it was hard work, discipline, faith, and a desire to build a country with limited government, free from tyranny, that were the factors in founding this nation. It was colonies/states that established the republic of republics form of government. The only reason why Mr. Bubble head wants open boarders so he can hire cheap labor, reducing his labor over head which in turn increases his profit margin there by lining his pockest with more riches. Not to mention that it plays right into the Progressives movement of diverity, multiculterism, and to replace white people of European ancestry (which is genocide under international law). Just my thoughts.
Deo Vindice
Boy.
People need to take a long, hard look at immigration.
There are just way too many folks here know, draining more resources than we can afford.
This may seem extreme, but I would be in favor of putting a freeze on all immigration, with the exception of tourists.
(Just my opinion as well).
TNSD,
I’m with you on this.
Deo Vindice
Idk, Virginia S.,
He is a very recent import from what became the Soviet Union. His family got out, right under the wire, with loads of money—- and he seems to work hand-in-glove with the left-right hybrid.
How can you separate out his ethnicity from the current targeted people in the u.s. (who are largely white protestants). For instance, you have TONS of movies about slaves, but only in the American South (almost categorically in the Anglo-Celt south, or with slavers played by Anglo-Celt looking people). The movies ARE NOT about the much more significant trade in south america.
In fact, the old Anglo-Celt slavers are being asked to PAY FOR the Spanish-Portugeuse slaves, in addition to their own. It’s not just a “black issue” now, is it? No… the real ex slaves being imported were owned by the Spanish (why they speak Spanish) but the American slave holders—- are held responsible in the Court of Hollywood. (This is just one example of the incredible duplicity here).
For the NYC mayor—- the most generational Americans are probably just the “dreaded Germans.” Basically perceived as Northern europeans, “anglos.”
Maybe he just wants to persecute them as some sort of payment for Germany.
Justifying a genocide—– by saying people deserve it because they genocided somebody, supposedly, is STILL genocide.
The whole issue of “CHEAP LABOR”—- I just don’t buy that as a motive at all!
Idk— maybe that wasn’t clear enough.
For some in the south— it was one thing to be told to pay something to blacks who were truly connected to slavery in the american south. BUT NOW… the Spanish slaves are imported by tens of millions and Anglo-Celts are supposed to pay for that, too—- ON THE BASIS of Hollywood movies being produced for years that make it seem Anglo-Celts should pay up for brown folks.
In a sense, the question is: Why can’t the Spanish pay for their own slaves?
Hollywood spends most of its money deflecting the slave question from European slaveholding Whites—- mostly onto Virginians. (and Georgians, Mississippi, Alabama, Carolinas).
Anglo-Celts are the scapegoat for europe on that.
Having the least— they’ve had to pay for all of it and be the demonized group (socially, in film, propaganda, etc.)
People such as the NYC mayor are helpful in that enterprise, since the Anglo-Celts overlap with the ethnic Germans (anglo-saxons) who are so much a part of his internal world, and posed as an enemy to him in his cosmology
Yes… the largely Anglo-Celt American South is Europe’s scapegoat when it comes to slavery.
Now, they import brown people (Spanish-Portuguese ex slaves) by the tens of millions and expect Anglo-Celts to deal with it (the Anglo-Celt upper South).
They should deal with their own slaves!
“know” should be now.
Sorry.
Virginia Southron,
Thanks.
Idk – Bubble head sounds like George Soros (or is that open sores?)with a Napoleon complex. I wounder if the two know each other? Anyway, slavery in any form is despicable. I guess he should concentrate on fixing NYC’s real problems. Now for all you bible believers out there, the Hebrew children were enslaved for 400 yrs. I am going to pose a question to ya’ll. When God purposes slavery to what end does the act bring about? As a side note there is a black professor at UGA (I wish I could remember his name) claims he can prove that the blacks in Egypt contributed to the culture in that region. Now to my way of thinking if they were living and contributing to the Egyptian culture would they not be involved in the enslavement of the Hebrew children? And if they were, then would not the descendants of the Hebrew children (Jews)be entitled to slave reparations? Now, I think there are some folks here that do not think kindly of the folks of Jewish persuasion, but please set that aside. Now that I have finished digressing, back to the topic. Another question. When man purposes slavery to what end does the act bring about? Just thinkin out loud.
Deo Vinddice