Anti-racism is a code word for anti-Southern and anti-White.

Getting back to the topic at hand…I’m having a lot of trouble getting behind the “Southern mantra” that was proposed here, but unfortunately I can’t really put my finger on why and I don’t have much in the way of suggestions to improve it. I tend to agree with a previous commenter that being Southern is quite a bit more complicated than being White, and perhaps that is why coming up with a catchy and concise Mantra is problematic. Maybe the direction we should go in is running with Whitaker’s mantra and pushing the idea that Southerners are on the front lines of White genocide in America, and that Southern nationalism is part of the solution to stopping it. We can point out the historical spirited resistance of the Southern people in the 1960s when the genocide began. And so on. That’s just my feeling.

Believe it or not, in so many words you just stated a creed of the South, plus your testimony. Personally I put much more respect and emphasis on one’s creed than in any motto or mantra or any simple statement. It is much more involving while stated in general terms. If we look up the term “creed” we would see that it concerns a person’s faith, religious as well as sociological. It really places a burden on people who tries to oppose anothers’ creed!

How about, “When in Rome do as the Romans do.” Everybody should know that one! But what about the rest of it? The ways it can be expanded and discerned? What about when one is NOT in Rome; How would they do? Surly some people would still do as the Romans do. Are they not Romans at heart? What about the people in Rome that does not do as the Romans do? Are they still Romans? Remember in Scripture that the main discerning differencing between Israelites and Jews was the fact that Israelites were ALL the people of Israel while the Jews were distinctly the people that practiced Judaism observing the Covenant with God. And note, to be a Jew did not mean you definitely had to live in Israel either!

Yes absolutely, culture comes from the mindset one has and not vice versa, for one has to believe in something before they can practice it or become a part of it. To deny this only limits one’s understanding and reality of the rest of the world.

A many a time I’ve had to distinguish for people the BIG difference in being a yankee and a Northerner. There is nothing bad about being a Northerner, it is a good thing in its’ own way, but it is being a yankee that is among the highest of insults! And yankees can and do come from the South! Yankees are no different today than they were before Lincoln’s War.

I am blessed with being born and raised in North Carolina, my dad’s folks from Tennessee. However, even with that, it does not give me some superior state of thought and faith concerning what I believe. It does give me a direct inheritance and connection to the only culture I’ve known and accepted. (Yes I’ve observed many other cultures.) I only got the benefit of a good head start and teaching in the right ways by being born into a Southern culture. Another way for all others born outside the South is to think of themselves as being adopted.

I fall away from the League of the South and the Southern National Congress, or anyone when they try and portray only themselves as a certain group worthy to lead all others as a country or nation. Matter of fact I can say I have more blacks that I feel closer to and would defend as my dear friends than the majority of whites. I would rather be associated with these like minded people than others who oppose my faith, regardless of color. For one should learn with enough wisdom, that when 2 or more people agree in creed, faith, culture and heritage, that TRANSCENDS all colors… Then there becomes no color between those people. If only other people here and elsewhere had the wisdom and judgement to understand and accept this…. (Yes I also believe there MUST be a set way, a litmus test in order to vote, that the vote MUST be limited, but color or race is NOT the way to go about it.)

Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

There is so much more to be a real Southerner than any words can describe, everyone including those true Southerners holds their own views as to what constitutes Southern and Southern values, heritage and culture. Many of these views overlap but there can be no catch all defining phrase, nor should there be.

It is a terrible mistake to regulate being a true Southern to simply being born in the South and holding true Southerner views. Southern history itself shows the Southern people to be more diversified than this. Although there are strict limits on this diversity. The ONLY over-riding fact concerning being Southern is being born in the South while holding those Old Southern views in greatest part.

All of us through our ancestry came from somewhere with many differing influences molding the Old Southern character and what remains of it today. Sure it can be stated that the majority of Southerners originated from the Celts, but it took much more than just the Celts to form the Southern Culture with the heritage we know today.

In the totality of life and the specific part as it concerns Old Line Southerners, there had to be a basis of thought that transcended nationalities and even cultures of people in order that the Southern Culture be created and exist. I would think no one here would debate the point that the top most inspirational ideology in comprising the Southern culture is the rational of freedom and being a sovereign people. This is clearly shown from the Scots even before William Wallace, BUT it is not strictly a view and ideology held by them.

We can ask anyone from anywhere the general question; What does freedom mean to you? You will almost always get a similar response, however it is the details that sets Southerns apart, and it is those details that is shared by ANYONE who holds Southern sympathies, regardless where they live. Very similar can be stated concerning religion, which is why Catholics plays a large part in Southern culture, especially in the deep South. What people share is more than just being Southern, but of having like minds and views of life.

You cannot regulate the culture and heritage of Old Line Southerners to just the South, for if you do you alienate many people who otherwise would wish to share your and partake of this philosophy and ideology, all in order to survive and even thrive. There are many people in the North, and I have seen it myself, that shares our deepest views concerning life and culture, and there are people from all over the world that feels likewise. And it would be such people that would help continue our heritage and culture after we are gone.

Sven Niebler is a German who frequents these Southern pages, and he is very sincere and dedicated in his beliefs towards our old Southern culture and heritage. His religious views also closely match. He wasn’t born here as far as I know; but; does that make him an outsider, someone to be regulated as a stranger, especially after he has proven himself so noble to our cause and beliefs? Does this mean the previous Germans that claimed to be of the Old Southern beliefs, and being born here are also strangers to us? Does not their contributions help make us what we are today?

I am afraid by painting yourself with mantras and phrases, trying to establish Southern culture and heritage to just a few defining statements is not only unjust and wrong, but it is a hazard and trap that can actually help in the genocide of our culture and people! We have to be all inclusive to all that *Believes* as we do, and shows the *faith* that we do. Else we might as well get in a box and wait until we are totally assimilated and gone.

I got into a discussion with our *good* friend Brooks Simpson before I cremated him a couple of times. (He most likely is reading this as Michael’s site, SNN is one of his favorites.)
The exchange started when he had posted concerning; what was Southern Heritage and Culture? He gave examples of what some of you had previously stated. I thought, this is a good topic to challenge him on, so I wrote him my understanding. After a few exchanges of posts Simpson stated he would have to think on my comments as he had never considered them before.

He could not pin me simply because you cannot pin someone who doesn’t place themselves in a corner, giving the opposition mantras and statements defining themselves as just one thing. At the same time this shows the flexibility and inclusion of what we are and why we became what we are, and no one is left out that wishes to believe and have the faith that we do. It leaves us room to grow and to add believers unto us, and in the process it also shows we are not as biased, prejudiced and racist as we are made out to be. The more people can adapt this understanding and apply it and be accepting of others, the better this works, the more we thrive as a people and the more people we attract with like minds and faith.

Michael– Deo Vindicabamur

We are in a position whereby we are accepting the Yankee position as true and are constantly defending against that. We need to take ourselves out of the argument and go on offence. We know that the Yankees lie about us, so why argue with them? We need to concentrate in building up our own, and those who did move South and want to assimilate (Copperheads) and educate. This website is a good place to start. There’s also the LOS. I believe there should be county chapters that are subsets of the State chapters, which are subsets of the main chapter headed by Dr. Hill.
As far as blacks…I have found that many southern blacks have been corrupted and changed for the worse by the hip-hop culture of LA, NYC and Chicago. Real Southern blacks (most of them the oldsters) are appalled at what’s happened as much as we are, and unfortunately, Gen X (sic) Southern blacks were the first ones to accept and spread this attitude. There are many that are still not tainted by the “culture” and, although we’re culturally different, we had a sense of respect of each other.
That being said, I’d rather hang out with a Southern black than with a white Yankee any day.

“To the more recently transported Irish— the Anglo-Scots south IS MERELY a reflection of the North Irish question. They treat you like you’re the Queen, lol. Which is very strange if you’ve been around it and experience it (i.e. the IRA sees my type is ‘british loyalist.”)”

All the Irish I know would disagree with you on this. Have you seen the movie “Hidden Agenda”? I highly recommend it. Also, the IRA is who is pushing for “multiculturalism” in Ireland and N. Ireland today. The true “republicans” do not back the existing IRA and have formed another group, the RIRA. Jerry Adams and Sinn Fein are not seen as anything but lackey’s for the Brits.

Seems to me our lives have been caught up with the BQ— blacks are what we have been with in our culture.

But today’s Northeastern (having wiped out, not only the puritans, but almost ALL the protestant north)— is of populations whose internal worlds are full of other characters (in the ways we have a consciousness of blacks).

To the more recently transported Irish— the Anglo-Scots south IS MERELY a reflection of the North Irish question. They treat you like you’re the Queen, lol. Which is very strange if you’ve been around it and experience it (i.e. the IRA sees my type is ‘british loyalist.”)

Same with Jews— we are naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews. Teutonics… Saxons. Evil Germans.

Same with catholics– why Hollywood (which isn’t all jewish, btw) concentrates on the Virginia slavers (i.e. YOU HEAR NOTHING of slavery by Spain or Portugal in HOLLYWOOD movies, although they had like 90% of the Transatlantic trade)

African blacks—- were not slaves in America. They do not share the American black experience.

Southerners, in my cosmology, do themselves a bit of disservice by hanging on so strongly to the old yankee paradigm— under all these new circumstances— and an inundation by populations whose understanding of “what southern is” has zero to do with puritans.

Don’t put new wine in old wine skins, as the book says—

These new populations are framing US in accordance with Hollywood, yes BUT ALSO through the lens of the politics they come from. To jews, we are nazis. To northeast catholics, we are heretics (unless you’re deep south, and catholic, like the french legacy, etc., or southwest) To Irish, we are possibly celts, and can connect, or anglos (and thereby EVIL)

We have to attend to how they frame US— in accordance with their own internal worlds

The root of this is natal, native, BIRTH. Usually, I tend to push against the co-option of the term to mean “culture” separate from kinship group.

There is a North-Euro South (largely protestant anglo-celt) and the South Euro South (largely catholic latin)— e.g.: Richmond and New Orleans. Ultimately, the european south.

This is the only south slated for genocide— racially and THEREFORE culturally.

Our culture was and is a racial expression, imo.

Look at the difference between our handling of the BQ and how the jews have handled it. By making separations (and in a way people don’t think about) IT WAS ACTUALLY THE SOUTH that was acknowledging the different realities of “A People” and making allowance for it.

In other words, it was White Southerners who were a NON-GENOCIDAL people. They enslaved, but surely did not WIPE OUT another group (in fact blacks increased exponentially, lol)

GENOCIDE is worse than slavery!

Get there— and your opposition is toast.

The point should be to hold your opposition accountable for your attempted genocide.

Southern is a sub-group of the overall white genocide.

An attempt at really dumbed down “pan whiteness” (where because people are just WHITE, they are “like you,” and make that case in order to justify totally overrunning your home area without even thinking you should have a neighborhood— would be “pro white genocide” (wiping out a white sub-group)

What you’ll see on the “yankees” that you see now, most probably—- is they are the front runners, what comes right before mexicans.

They ARE NOT the old Puritans—- and many would rather have mexican workers around than southern whites or blacks.