Today, we have two recent examples of the forces of ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’ attacking and bullying peaceful people. The first comes from Sweden, where nationalists were rallying to bring attention to the ongoing replacement of the Swedish people with Third World immigrants. Several hundred Left-wing, anti-White activists attacked police and tried to get at the Swedish nationalists. The second comes from a Chick-fil-A restaurant in Chicago where gay pride activists bullied a homeless man quietly reading his Bible, mocked and insulted the man and shouted in his face while proclaiming their disbelief in God.
SWEDEN
The Sacramento Bee is running an Associated Press article that reports on the anti-nationalist violence:
Swedish activists clashed with police amid a hail of bottles and fireworks in downtown Stockholm on Saturday as they tried to break through a police line and attack an anti-Islam demonstration.
Police spokesman Kjell Lendgren said around 400 leftists had gathered to heckle the 100-strong demonstration, which was rallying to bring attention to what it perceives is the Islamization of Europe.
He said the leftists shouted and blew vuvuzelas to drown out anti-Islam and nationalist speeches, but then started throwing bottles and lit fireworks at police, injuring two officers.
Lendgren said ten activists were arrested, after which the situation calmed down.
CHICAGO
Anne Sorok of Legal Insurrection reports on homosexual activists bullying a homeless street preacher at a Chick-fil-A restaurant:
I attended Friday night’s “Kiss-in” protest outside the only Chick-fil-A location in Chicago. The small group of between twenty to thirty protesters gathered outside the restaurant around 7pm. A few same-sex couples took the opportunity to kiss in public, as the protest organizers encouraged attendees to do on their facebook page.
…While there, a group formed around an elderly African-American homeless man, who was reading his bible while seated along a fence rail off to the side of the protest. Some in the group confronted the man, who was reading the bible aloud, and engaged him in theological debates. A few others took the opportunity to mock the man….
…Nearing the end of the protest, someone from the group wrote on the sidewalk in front of the homeless man, “He’s Really Gay Deep Down,” with an arrow pointed to where he was seated.
Also see: Attacked by ‘Tolerance’
Thanks to Occidental Dissent for the link!
People should question the hecklers—– ARE THEY gay? Have they even ever had a homosexual encounter? Most of these people protesting are NOT gay, and so it begs the question of why they are bullying people over 4% of the population (the number of gays) when they are totally not connected to it. Who told them to do that? Why is so much focus given something so disproportionate?
They are NOT gay.
So, why are they endangering people who really are? Don’t they really care about them? After all, THEY are not gay. Tomorrow, they will go do something else. But now, due to their rabble rousing and bullying, they have set up real gay people to take the backlash that they, totally non-gays, have generated.
How “nice” is that? How tolerant? They are trying to incite people, who might have backlash to gays, when they are not gay themselves.
And yet they act like they’re moral—– when by their own TERMS, they would not be tolerance, peaceful, or nice (not because of bullying this man, but that too— but b/c they incite against gays when they aren’t gay (by their own terms, this makes them anti-gay, really)
Liberals like this, in their patronizing drive to speak for others (WHO THEY ARE NOT) CAUSE harm to many.
Why doesn’t somebody ask them all that?
I would hope that at some point people will begin to realize that we are not “one nation” and the only way to save ourselves and our culture is to separate. I know Michael posted an article about Northern crusader-ism but unfortunately many Southerners have this same mentality. Most Southerners will not consider secession because they are focused on taking control of the Federal government with the objective of remaking the entire US territory into their own image. They do not understand that they cannot impose our worldview onto Californians, New Yorkers, Massachusites, and others but these cultures can corrupt their own. The only solution is secession.
Another non issue and over blown media hype of the entire Chick-Fil-A fiasco. From what the story said this “incidence” took place in the public forum where he was “mocked” and “insulted”.
There is absolutely no protection from being “mocked” and “insulted”. It is petty to be making a case whenever someone claims to be “mocked” or “insulted”. Any such laws against mocking or insulting others would be an affront to what’s left of our freedom of speech. To make this type of alleged incidence illegal would tie up the courts indefinitely where anyone could claim a tort from be mocked or insulted.
The man had the choice to either vacate the public forum or grow up and not give a damn about what others think. I can’t waste my time feeling sorry for grown people who act like children and think the world should be “fair”. If the man wants to stay in the public forum… he has to understand not everyone will agree with his beliefs or public demonstrations of faith.
Chad, just because I think someone has the right to do something doesn’t mean I endorse them doing it or that I won’t criticise them for doing it. For example, one has a right to use profanity in public, to cheat on your wife or get blind drunk everyday and waste your life away. However, these are not positive actions and I think we should use social pressure to urge people to behave in a civilised, moral manner. These gay activists, for example, have a right to gang up on this homeless man and mock him, but what they are doing is not a positive activity. Furthermore, it demonstrates a tendency amongst the ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’ crowd – that being complete intolerance for true diversity of opinion. No place in US society is this more evident than the universities.
Political Correctness – Where intolerance is not tolerated.
I know of a woman whose husband died not even 2 weeks ago. She was on facebook ranting about Chick-Fil-A. They are truly a sick lot. Hate like this is demonic.
Michael,
I guess I have a different perception of the situation than you. To me this is an incident that has taken place up North, not in Dixie. I would never expect any of these people to have common decency,manners or any semblance of civilization. To me it would be foolish to expect them to behave in any other manner in which they did because they are Yankees.
Since this did not take place in Dixie, I attempt to mind my own business as the intra actions and disputes of a barbaric people are of no concern to me. I think it is just as inappropriate for Yankees to attempt to manipulate and call for change here in Dixie as it is for Southerners to attempt to social engineer and manipulate the internal behaviors of Yankees.
In addition, Yankee culture has never been about “tolerance”. It is about brute force and government violence to control those that the Yankees don’t approve of. My version of tolerance is what ever people do on their own property is none of my business. This does not mean I approve or disapprove of their action, simply it is not my place to micromanage and tell other people what they are doing is wrong unless they have caused direct harm to another person or their property.
Chad, we can ignore events like this in Chicago and elsewhere in the empire when the people who purvey them no longer exercise control over us. Until then, it is our business because these very same people taunting this man on the street can directly impact us in the South by supporting and voting for Washington politicians who carry through their anti-Southern/anti-Christian/anti-White agendas. We shouldn’t avoid taking the opportunity to expose these people on a regular basis, because clearly at this point it hasn’t bothered enough of us to spark a call for separation from them.
This is at least the second article in which I’ve seen you assume that Michael’s criticism and condemnation of certain actions automatically means he would like the government to somehow intervene and prevent them.
Jared,
If you feel the need to join the Yankees in being the busybodies of the world,by all means go for it. I am sure they will be thrilled to have converted someone else to their way of thinking.
As for me, I plan to stay out of the internal affairs of other nations, ethnic groups, etc.
Chad, we can ignore events like this in Chicago and elsewhere in the empire when the people who purvey them no longer exercise control over us. Until then, it is our business because these very same people taunting this man on the street can directly impact us in the South by supporting and voting for Washington politicians who carry through their anti-Southern/anti-Christian/anti-White agendas. We shouldn’t avoid taking the opportunity to expose these people on a regular basis, because clearly at this point it hasn’t bothered enough of us to spark a call for separation from them.
There’s a copy/paste of my previous comment, because apparently you didn’t read it carefully the first time. Maybe instead of just calling me a busybody, perhaps this time you can be a little more specific as to what is wrong with my reasoning.
Jared,
You can view things however you would like. I don’t really care. There is nothing wrong with my reading or reasoning skills. Let me break this down for you so that you can understand on a more basic level.
My position is that the internal affairs of other ethnics, cultures and nations are really none of any other groups business. Therefore, it is not my concern, business or affair on how they act or their lack manners. This is why I believe the Southern people have no business “taking the opportunity to expose these people on a regular basis”. It’s childish to sit back and point out what we don’t like about other people.
(Though if this article had focused on how how the protestors in Dixie differed from those in the North it would be a great way to highlight how the people of Dixie handles their differences than the Yankees do).
Your position is that you think that you/southern people should be involved in, criticize, condemn, etc the internal affairs of other ethnics, cultures and nations (kinda like the Yankees do in the Dixie, Asia, the Middle East, etc).
These are mutually exclusive positions. There is no common ground on which we can agree on if we hold these differing opinions. You either think we should meddle and be a busybody in other foreign affairs or not.
Instead of wasting our time criticizing, condemning and meddling in Yankee affairs, I think that Southerners should focus on education, ideas, projects, institutions, etc that focus on how to separate from the Yankees. It is easy to sit back and criticize the Yankees… its a whole nother story on working to separate from them. Acting how Yankees do will not get us any closer ending the UNITED STATES nation state in Dixie.
“Your position is that you think that you/southern people should be involved in, criticize, condemn, etc the internal affairs of other ethnics, cultures and nations (kinda like the Yankees do in the Dixie, Asia, the Middle East, etc).
These are mutually exclusive positions. There is no common ground on which we can agree on if we hold these differing opinions. You either think we should meddle and be a busybody in other foreign affairs or not.”
NO that is NOT my position. Apparently there really is something wrong with your reading skills. Let me copy and paste, yet again. I’ll use CAPS this time for emphasis on the especially relevant words and phrases.
We can ignore events like this in Chicago and elsewhere in the empire WHEN THE PEOPLE WHO PURVEY THEM NO LONGER EXERCISE CONTROL OVER US. Until then, it is our business because these very same people taunting this man on the street can DIRECTLY IMPACT US IN THE SOUTH by supporting and voting for Washington politicians who carry through their anti-Southern/anti-Christian/anti-White agendas.”
Why can’t you get this, Chad? I will say it again: if our people were so much aware of how incompatible our culture and general world view are with Yankees, then the Southern Nationalist ranks would be much larger than they are. This is obvious evidence that our differences need to be exposed and highlighted whenever we see them manifested in current events – whether in the north or elsewhere – to reinforce the notion that we ought to become free of these people. It isn’t about trying to change the Yankees or meddle in their affairs. That’s not the purpose AT ALL. You’re acting like reporting on this even which took place in Chicago is on the same level as if it occurred in India, which is utterly ridiculous. Did Indians invade and conquer our people? No. Do Indians continue to regularly exercise power over us today and attack our culture and heritage? No. Do Indians in India have any ability whatsoever to directly impact life in the South through their social policies? Do you get it yet? Do you see the difference?
I cannot for the life of me understand why you think reporting on stories like this doesn’t help make our case for separation from the US empire. If disdain for Yankees among our people was as prevalent as you seem to believe, then why isn’t Southern nationalism and secession far more popular than it is? You need to remember that this website is about advancing and promoting Southern nationalism, which obviously includes trying to recruit new supporters of our cause. If the rest of our people were as astute and aware of the Yankee plague as we are, then you wouldn’t see the Yankee banner proudly displayed in cities and outside homes everywhere you go in the South.
Jared,
You are a really funny man… It is never our business to care about or interfere in the internal matters of other nations and ethnic groups. Picking apart their culture and lifestyle does nothing to promote or enhance a Southern Nationalist Movement… in fact it would probably turn most people off (after all why replace the current regime with those who wish to make it their business to care about what other nations do…. the Yankee Empire already has that down pat).
I like how you justify advocating being involved in Chicago by pointing to the wrongs of the American Empire (it is childish to point to worse behavior in order to justify your own desire to pick apart the people of Chicago).
But I tire of debating with someone who advocates involving themselves in and picking apart other ethnic groups/nation… and then denying out of the the other side of their mouth…. you know politics might be a good field for you to go into.
This will be my last post on this article because it obvious adds no value to the Southern Nationalist movement to continue it.
“This will be my last post on this article because it obvious adds no value to the Southern Nationalist movement to continue it.”
You’re definitely right about that. I regret that I even spent time on it as well. You never once made any serious attempt to counter my reasoning. Might as well have been talking to a cow.
Chad, you are missing a key point in Jared’s argument. You, Jared, and I know that we are a separate nation from the Yankees. Everyone on this site knows that. But who else knows that? You are acting like our independence is already won, like we already have our own government, and like the Yanks have no power over us anymore. But that is plain and simple not the case right now. De Jure logic is a wonderful thing. I fully support and believe in it. But we have to be realistic and recognize that there is another power at work here, the ever annoying De Facto logic. De Jure logic says we may be a different country, but De Facto says we are still a part of the Yankee Empire. And as long as we remain a part of the Yankee Empire, the goings on in Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles, Seattle, etc. *ARE* our concern, because they affect the empire that we happen to live in, and help shape the policy of the government that happens to rule over our native states. Once we achieve independence, I will gladly stand by your side and say, “Let them do as they please in Chicago.” But right now, Chicago affects us, and therefore we *ought* to care about what happens there. That was Jared’s point, and I urge you to read his post with that in mind.
Thanks for the backup, VS. Perhaps the way you have worded the exact same argument I made will magically strike a chord in Chad’s psyche which causes him to “get it”. He should have understood the point with my first comment, then again when I copied and pasted it, and then yet AGAIN when I restated it and provided additional exposition.
Eh…anyway, at least somebody else has echoed my bewilderment with Chad in this thread.