We knew it was coming. It was inevitable given our flagging of the seat of evil (the SPLC headquarters in Montgomery), the podcast we recorded mocking the SPLC and the PC Confederates and the politically-incorrect interview we did with Dr Michael Hill, president of the League of the South. We are still waiting for the slow, over-paid bureaucrats at the SPLC to put together their propaganda against us. In the meantime, one of the minor figures in the anti-Southern blogging world, Andy Hall, has fired the first salvo our way. And it’s a pretty weak volley, to be honest.
Mr Hall, on his site DeadConfederates.com, essentially makes people aware (in very negative terms, of course) of our recent offensive against the PC Confederates who have been undermining the cause. He then quotes from our interview with Dr Hill. He attacks the League for its recent denunciation of the term ‘racism.’ Finally, Hall makes fun of yours truly for, of all things, my height. lol Apparently, the fact that I am 5’9″ is humourous to Mr Hall.
There are only two parts of this attack that I wish to respond to here. The first is the claim that SNN and the League are ‘White nationalist’ organisations. Mr Hall begins his hit-piece by saying:
Anyone who’s been paying attention knows by now that the League of the South and the Southern Nationalist Network are explicitly white nationalist organizations. They’ve been saying so for a long time now, for anyone who takes the time to listen. That’s their right, of course, but we shouldn’t pretend that they’re really about anything else.
Of course, neither SNN nor the League has said we are White nationalists. In fact, I have on multiple occasions on the Golden Circle podcast and elsewhere on SNN stated that we are not White nationalists. As I have noted, the term ‘White nationalist’ makes no sense. Races are broad biological categories, not nations. There are many White nations, just as there are many Asian or African nations. Each race has numerous nations. The idea that all White people are a single nation is obviously incorrect. The fact that we Southern nationalists wish to secede from the United States and aim much of our historical criticism at New England should demonstrate the fact that we are not White nationalists. Yankees, who are White by the way, are not part of our nation of people; they are their own nation. I don’t mind Mr Hall or other anti-Southern writers and activists referring to us a ‘bigots’ or ‘haters’ – that is just par for the course; calling us names is the modus operandi of the anti-Southern blogosphere – but they could at least note when we have specifically answered the particular charge they are leveling against us – especially when that charge is as illogical as the term ‘White nationalist.’
Hall later claims that Dr Hill and I are centrally about promoting ‘White power’:
For all the discussion of abstract concepts they talk about like like liberty and freedom, their core concern is, explicitly, about maintaining and preserving white power — political, cultural and social.
Here, Mr Hall obviously fails to understand what nationalists are all about. Dr Hill and I are Southern nationalists. We promote the survival, well-being and independence of the Southern people in our historic territory. Yes, our people are White and we are happy with this fact and wish to remain as we were created. We believe that we should be free in our own land and should govern ourselves, just as all other nations of the world should be free in their land and should govern themselves. The only ‘power’ we seek is self-determination (a right which the United States has denied us). Of course, Hall being anti-White is upset that we don’t want to be blended out of existence. The fact that we are unapologetic about who we are and our desire for the preservation and independence of our people is something Mr Hall finds threatening. This is something I have noted about our enemies in past Golden Circle podcasts. Our victory means our survival and well-being in our land. Meanwhile, their victory means our genocide (a policy which leads to an attack on a people based on their ethnicity, religion, culture or race is defined as genocide under international law). Our enemies define as ‘hate’ and ‘bigotry’ the fact that we wish to survive as a distinct people and not be blended out of existence. When they attack us as being ‘White nationalists’ for promoting our survival and self-rule they are saying that we have no right to survive. They demand that we be part of their ‘melting pot’ and be blended out of existence in an increasingly Third World America. We reject this demand, of course, and do what we can to rally our people in these dark times. This is essentially why we are hated by the likes of Andy Hall, the SPLC, the NAACP and other anti-Southern elements.
I wonder how he feels about China wanting to preserve “Asian Power”. or Saudi Arabia wanting to preserve “Arab Power”. lol., our enemies are mind boggling, they absolutely detest the idea of culture and have no understanding of what it takes to protect and preserve a culture for future generations. Their own propaganda has made them ignorant of what it means to be a human being. They are “pod people” with no understanding of humanity.
I wonder what Ms. Hall thinks about a Southern Nationalist like Mr. H.K. Edgerton?
Masked Walnut, I’m sure he would be unable to adequately answer a question like that. To our enemies an Italian nationalist, for example, is a ‘White supremacist’ but an Egyptian nationalist is just an Egyptian nationalist. In other words, everyone else except for us has the right to preserve who and what they are. This, as I mentioned, if put into policy, is an act of genocide.
And…I know you just chose “Italian Nationalist” as a random example, but even they have the same type of forced unity like we experience here in North America…and many of the countries we know of in Europe are faux countries that have had unity at the point of a bayonet or a cannon.
CP, that’s a good point. I probably should have chosen a better example such a Scottish nationalist or Danish nationalist or Finnish nationalist.
It is just hard to take these type of people seriously… After all, what type of person would want to see their entire culture reduced to minority status in their own homeland?
For many passive anti-Whites and anti-nationalists, it’s not necessarily that they actively WANT genocide. They just don’t care about it. I ran across such a person on Facebook today who openly admitted as such. He said America needs MORE legal immigration to help pay the expenses associated with Social Security and Medicare. He is a self-proclaimed “conservative” by the way. After at first denying there was a such thing as White genocide, I finally got him to simply admit that he didn’t care about it. Now that he has been shown the truth, he is just as guilty as the most ardent and enthusiastic supporters of genocide by virtue of his apathy.
For Andy Hall and Brooks Simpson (are they the same person?) there is only white racism, all non-whites are free to preserve their culture and race.
That’s a severe form of race hatred, it would be described by a honest psychologist as a psychopathology that ought to be treated because it is a form of self hatred, self loathing, one step removed from doing physical harm to one’s self.
Of course, I reject, utterly, any claim by these mentally ill people that I hate anyone based on either their culture or race.
I don’t want to be a Mexican, nor do I want any of my family members to be a Mexican. That does not imply hatred at all, it shouts out that I like my culture and will continue to protect it.