Welcome to Southern Nationalist Network

Member Login

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Sign Up!

More on PC Confederates

July 17, 2012
By

Today, I had an extended exchange with the more PC elements in the so-called Southern heritage preservation movement. I say ‘so-called’ because the PC Confederates have been unable to actually preserve anything. They have lost one battle after another and are perpetually in a state of retreat and defeat. They (thankfully) inspire almost none of our people with their message. Of course, back when the South was strong it was not politically-correct and the Southern people rejected the egalitarian, universalist and anti-White ideas promoted by PC Confederates. At any rate, I thought I would share the conversation with y’all. I have blotted out the names because I have no wish for this post to be interpreted as an attack against anyone. What I am against is this failed mentality and strategy of trying to make our cause politically-correct – of adopting the social values of those who hate us. This sort of defeatist rhetoric must be avoided if we are to make the South strong again. Remember, this is no longer the Dark Age. We are now moving into the Age of Survival. The hay-day of this sort of PC rhetoric in our ranks is over. The PC Confederate approach has no place in our movement. For us to actually defend our people (and I am against us being on defense – we should instead transition to offense by getting on a consistent message) and heritage we must eliminate the PC Confederate mentality.

There are several things to notice here. First, check out how defensive the PC Confederates are. Their approach to Southern heritage is entirely defensive, which means they are always moving backwards. Second, notice that if you say anything remotely Southern nationalist (even quoting long-dead Southern leaders) they immediately chime in with an anti-White message. Immediately. Third, notice that they accuse you of being a ‘White nationalist’ (which is an oxymoron since races are broad biological categories, not nations) if you quote actual Confederates talking about race and nationality. This is precisely what the SPLC, NAACP or ADL would do. There are lots of lessons which can be learned from their un-natural approach. We should learn to spot such signs immediately and deal with them. Many of these people are just parroting what they have heard. Many have positive instincts but have been led astray. We can reach lots of these folks by getting on a consistent message and pointing out what they are doing (in many cases they are unaware of how PC their rhetoric is). Others (the infiltrators and their leaders) are more insidious. We just have to eliminate them from our ranks – they will continue to harm our people and the cause if they are allowed to do their work amongst us.

Also see: PC Confederates

Note: The picture I posted at the beginning of the conversation can be seen here

Also note: Image below may be enlarged

 

Share

Tags: , , , ,

7 Responses to More on PC Confederates

  1. SouthernAtHeart on July 17, 2012 at 11:33 pm

    Good discussion Michael. I think it’s very hard for Americans with european ancestry to understand a “people” and “a distinct culture” because the brainwashing since day one is that we are a “melting pot” and have adopted the multicultural label of “Americans.” 150 years ago that was not the case. Most people I believe have no clue to their ancestry unless of course they live in an area which was settled by their european ancestors who still celebrate their cultural holidays (like Polish folks in Wisconsin or the Irish in Boston). One side of my family has been in “America” since 1650, from York, England. Oddly enough, I have always been drawn to that part of England, and only recently learned these things about my ancestors. So it’s in the DNA whether anyone wants to admit it or not. But on the whole the brainwashing program of the past 112 years through forced federal education has done its damnedest to wipe out any idea of a “people” with a “distinct culture” which settled and tamed this country and made it the once beautiful shining example of hard work and industry that it was.

  2. Michael on July 17, 2012 at 11:42 pm

    Thank you, SAH. You are right. Most people are brainwashed into reflexively promoting an agenda that was been violently opposed by Southerners even just a few decades ago. I do think this brainwashing has about ran its course though. As we become a minority in our own land we see lots of positive trends. Whites are voting together as a block in much greater numbers than before. Young White people believe that the oppression against them is just as serious as the oppression against those of other races (this is a positive step since most Babyboomers certainly don’t believe this). And we see a change in rhetoric. The term ‘anti-White’ is now used widely and constantly gaining more ground. This is truly a weapon for us just as ‘racist’ is for our enemies. We also see that more and more Whites scoff or roll their eyes when some anti-White claims that someone else is ‘racist.’ Our enemy’s term is losing its hold. Language is very important. We think in terms of the language we use. This shapes our world-view and in turn leads to action.

  3. HW on July 18, 2012 at 1:33 am

    If the SPLC hung a Confederate flag outside their offices in Montgomery, you wouldn’t be able to tell the difference.

  4. SouthernAtHeart on July 18, 2012 at 6:16 pm

    @HW… tell the difference BETWEEN what, exactly??

  5. Chad on July 18, 2012 at 8:13 pm

    I tried to be a part of the group also, but found that for the most part they are undying loyalist and apologist of the American Empire. Seeing that I don’t have really anything in common with those types of people I haven’t participated in their discussion since. I ended up in a debate with some of those guys against United States warmongering… and somehow they are convinced in their minds without the United States the entire world would be crushed under Nazi rule. Yet, when I asked them to present a clear compelling facts to support their ascertains,,, they came up very short.

  6. The Masked Walnut on July 18, 2012 at 8:20 pm

    yes the “Nazis wouldve taken over the world” argument is very common. I usually counter it with “if the US hadnt involved itself in World War 1 there would not have been a World War 2″. Arguments made by pseudo-historians are easy to counter since they seem to reach back only a few decades and completely disregard everything that happened before.

  7. CapnConfederacy on July 20, 2012 at 12:49 pm

    I couldn’t help but laugh at the one fella. With the ancestor that was German. Why do you hate Germany so much Michael? haha I don’t know where he got that from.

Leave a Reply



Images