Imagine if a leader of the UN and giant in the financial and energy industries advocating bring in tens of millions of non-Asians into China or Japan to undermine their national homogeneity. Or imagine if such a man advocated bringing in tens of millions of non-Africans into Nigeria to undermine their national homogeneity. And imagine that that he announced such a recommendation publicly to the world without shame, claiming that this process was for the good of the Chinese or Nigerians. What sort of reaction could we expect from the Chinese or Nigerians? Naturally, they would outraged – and rightfully so – that a world leader was openly advocating undermining their people. This is precisely what happened recently, except that, of course, the nations which were being targeted for undermining were all White European nations. Brian Wheeler reports on the story for the BBC:
Peter Sutherland promotes White genocide
The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.
Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.
…Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.
He told the House of Lords committee migration was a “crucial dynamic for economic growth” in some EU nations “however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states”.
An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the “key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states”, he added.
“It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.”
…He told the committee: “The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.
“And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”
Mr Sutherland recently argued, in a lecture to the London School of Economics, of which he is chairman, that there was a “shift from states selecting migrants to migrants selecting states” and the EU’s ability to compete at a “global level” was at risk.
A few things should be pointed out about Mr Sutherland and his proposal. Firstly, he is a big wig at Goldman Sachs, which is always a leading contributor to both major candidates in US presidential races (ensuring it has its hooks in whoever wins) and practically owns the US Treasury (there is essentially a revolving door relationship between the two). Second, he’s also a big wig in the energy business (a former chairman of BP). Third, he’s a big wig at the United Nations. These positions put Mr Sutherland amongst the highest elites, a position where he could do great good for his people (he is of Scottish and Irish ancestry) if he wanted. Fourth, he is only advocating ‘multiculturalism’ in White countries: the EU states, US, Austrialia and New Zealand. Fifth, he specifically states the governments of these countries should ‘undermine’ the homogeneity even if this is unpopular with the people. Sixth, Europe is already multicultural and diverse, even setting aside the tens of millions of Third World immigrants who have been brought in over the last couple of decades. The British Isles by themselves are incredibly diverse with the Scots, Irish, English, Cornish, Welsh, etc. This organic, native diversity is not at all White Mr Sutherland is advocating, as he makes abundantly clear. It is quite obvious that ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘diversity,’ as used by elites like Mr Sutherland, are code words for White genocide. For all the talk of the globalists about democracy, we notice that their push for what is genocide under international law comes first.
Thanks to Rebellion for the link!
Also see: Peter Sutherland: Advocate of White genocide
I highly doubt this man’s ancestry; you don’t get to the top at Goldman-Sux without being a member of the Tribe. His “wikipedia” page also lists him as a member of Bilderberg, and the Trilateral Commission. The goal of GS is to rape and pillage through economic war and military war every country on earth for the benefit of The Tribe. They’ve been doing this since before the first corporation was formed in “the city of London” in 1062. There is a reason our ancestors threw out all members of The Tribe in every european country many times over, until they had become so entrenched with their lending practices (fueled by the egos of the monarchs) that it was impossible to remove them. They are parasites and their goal has always been to steal from others, and wipe out native peoples, based on their genocidal religion.
While there are some intelligent wealthy folks out there – looks like this guy is doing all he can to prove that wealth doesn’t buy brains.